VMware ties disaster recovery to vSphere, lifting obstacle to adoption

SRM version 4 supports vSphere and other upgrades

VMware’s Site Recovery Manager is now supporting vSphere, eliminating one of the obstacles preventing customers from upgrading to the latest version of VMware’s virtualization platform.

vSphere 4, the successor to ESX Server 3.5, was unveiled in April but until now did not work with Site Recovery Manager, VMware’s software for recovering virtual machines in case of disaster.

VMware on Monday released SRM version 4, with support for vSphere and other upgrades including a “many-to-one failover [that] protects multiple production sites with automated failover into a single, shared recovery site.”

Because Site Recovery Manager did not immediately support vSphere, numerous customers have delayed upgrades from 3.5, acknowledges Jon Bock, product marketing manager for VMware’s server business unit. Now that SRM supports vSphere, adoption should accelerate, he said.

“vSphere was a significant change that we had to update the add-on products for. In a perfect world, we’d love to have all the new releases of products released on the same day as the platform,” Bock said. But the months-long delay is similar to delays often seen between the release of a new operating system and add-on products, he said.

“A customer who has important production applications on ESX 3.5 is probably not going to upgrade to vSphere 4 the day after it’s released,” Bock said.

vSphere is still not supported by VMware View, the vendor’s desktop virtualization software. VMware View will be compatible with vSphere in its next release, expected in 2010, according to a VMware spokeswoman. Lifecycle Manager just gained compatibility with vSphere in a new release a few weeks ago.

In addition to support for vSphere, Site Recovery Manager now supports NFS storage, along with Fibre Channel and iSCSI, which were already supported.

“We have a lot of interest in NFS from customers looking at using that in important applications,” Bock says.

SRM works by integrating tightly with storage array-based replication. VMware provides an integration module to partners, and most of the major storage companies have made their products compatible with Site Recovery Manager.

Shared recovery sites, the other new feature, could be useful for companies with multiple branch offices, Bock said. Overall, the new release is “focused on expanding the use cases for Site Recovery Manager,” he said.

The new version of SRM is available now and costs $1,750 per processor. SRM was first released in June 2008 and has been purchased by more than 2,000 customers, Bock says. That’s still a small portion of VMware’s 150,000 customers overall.

Virtualization offers inherent advantages when it comes to disaster recovery, since it eliminates the need to recover the actual physical server an application was running on, Bock notes. Some customers have been using SRM not for disaster recovery but to move applications from one site to another when they are switching data centers, he said. Still, disaster recovery is the main purpose for the software.

SRM support for vSphere was a highly anticipated feature, says ITIC analyst Laura DiDio. “Disaster recovery and backup are in every customer’s top five checklist of things you must have,” she says.

Follow Jon Brodkin on Twitter

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags VMwarevirtualisation

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jon Brodkin

Network World
Show Comments


James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >


Victorinox Werks Professional Executive 17 Laptop Case

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?