CIOs clamor for usage-based pricing

Vendors eager to keep mining today's rich vein of upfront licensing revenue may resist the move. however

Sick of overpaying for features they don't need or use, enterprise software customers are eager for vendors to adopt pay-per-use models that better align cost with consumption, according to an IDC report published last month.

Vendors that are eager to keep mining today's rich vein of upfront licensing revenue may resist. But they risk losing customers to software-as-a-service providers like Amazon.com Inc., which offer pricing schemes closer to true pay-per-use models, IDC said.

"Customers believe they have been forced to buy more software than they need or use," wrote IDC analyst Amy Konary. This creates a "value disconnect" that isn't alleviated by heavy discounting, she said.

Konary argued that vendors should move to pay-per-use models, under which they will have to do more to make sure customers are satisfied, and "where real value is in the ease, intuitiveness, and seamlessness of the experience."

She compared it to the music industry's shift from selling CDs to selling individual songs to customers, who are now empowered by software to manage their music collections the way they want to. She also likened it to Amazon's Web-based storage service, EC2 , which lets companies host their own software and pay for it based on the number of application-hours used.

That's not true usage-based pricing -- users pay the same rate whether the app is heavily or lightly used -- but it allows customers to "purchase at a more granular level than was previously possible," Konary said.

Vendors are justified in fearing they would lose revenue from usage-based pricing, she wrote, but CIOs want assurance that costs won't suddenly spike as a result of unexpectedly heavy usage. A compromise would be the kind of tiered pricing used by cell phone carriers, Konary said.

This version of this story was originally published in Computerworld 's print edition. It's an edited version of an article that first appeared on Computerworld.com.

Read more about software in Computerworld's Software Knowledge Center.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags pay-per-usepricing models

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Eric Lai

Computerworld (US)
Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?