Film industry appeals iiNet decision

AFACT says that there are 'good grounds' for appeal

The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) has appealed a decision handed down in the Federal Court earlier this month. Justice Dennis Cowdroy ruled that Internet service provider iiNet had not authorised its users to breach copyright, and the ISP was cleared of any wrongdoing in regards to customers illegally downloading films and television shows using its network.

AFACT, representing Channel 7, Warner Bros Entertainment, Paramount Pictures and dozens of other film studios, said there were "good grounds" for appeal. AFACT executive director Neil Gane said the judgment did not follow already established copyright law in Australia.

“The court found large scale copyright infringements, that iiNet knew they were occurring, that iiNet had the contractual and technical capacity to stop them and iiNet did nothing about them,” he said. “If this decision stands, the ISPs have all the protection without any of the responsibility.”

Gane accused iiNet of ignoring the actions of copyright infringers, and said: “The decision harms not just the studios that produce and distribute movies, it but also Australia’s creative community and all those whose livelihoods depend on a vibrant entertainment industry.”

iiNet’s CEO, Michael Malone, responded to the appeal by stating that illegal downloads would continue, regardless of the outcome of the appeal lodged by the AFACT. He also said that continuing the legal process was not the right way to go.

“It is more than disappointing and frustrating that the studios have chosen this unproductive path,” Malone said. “This legal case has not stopped one illegal download and further legal appeals will not stop piracy."

Malone also said that the film studios admitted themselves during the court proceedings that an effective way to battle piracy was to make content more readily and cheaply available on the Internet.

He said there was growing evidence that content partnerships and agreements between ISPs, legal Web sites and copyright holders was doing more to reduce piracy and showcase copyright holders materials.

Malone said that iiNet’s Freezone was a prime example of these partnerships, as it provides subscribers with unmetered legal content that includes movies, music, television shows and sports events. iiNet revealed this week that more than 27 terabytes of data had been downloaded from its Freezone service between May 2009 and January 2010.

AFACT filed legal action against iiNet in November 2008 following a five month investigation by the organisation, with weekly notices sent to iiNet identifying the IP addresses of customers who had allegedly infringed the film companies' copyright. The case was heard in the Federal Court on 6 October, 2009, and immediately AFACT lawyers flagged almost 95,000 instances of alleged copyright infringement on iiNet's network. However the ISP was found to be not responsible for the actions of its users. The ruling was handed down on 4 February, 2010, with AFACT ordered to pay all of iiNet’s legal costs, which totalled $4 million.

The Notice of Appeal, which contains 15 grounds of appeal, was filed with the Federal Court last week and is likely to be heard later this year.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags iiNetmovie piracyAFACTAFACT v iiNet

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Kevin Cheng

Good Gear Guide
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?