Craving Legitimacy: just shut up and play!

Do modern games require deeper meaning to be worthy? Leigh Alexander investigates...

Leigh Alexander is news director at Gamasutra. She authors the Sexy Videogameland weblog and freelances reviews and criticism to Slate, The AV Club, Variety, and others.

Leigh Alexander is news director at Gamasutra. She authors the Sexy Videogameland weblog and freelances reviews and criticism to Slate, The AV Club, Variety, and others.

Is Bayonetta sexist? Is Resident Evil 5 racist? Does Call of Duty have something relevant to say about global warfare? These are just a few of the recent debates that have cropped up in the games press and in fan communities online — an example of the passionate and intellectual discussion that has become increasingly possible as games have evolved.

Those raised on the original Super Mario Bros. never thought about who the Princess “was” or why the mushrooms made you big — back then, gamers would never have guessed they might one day discuss Randian Objectivism in BioShock.

Just think: If Super Mario Bros. was released for the first time in the current era, would gamers simply enjoy it at face value, or would we debate whether or not its portrayal of large-nosed Italian brothers was culturally insensitive? Would we be reading forum posts about whether the Princess is “real” or a metaphor?

Craving Legitimacy
A modern-day Mario could have been received quite differently...

Bigger than any of the controversies that have arisen in recent years’ games is the question: Do we need to be having these discussions at all?

Many would say that if games can act as touchpoints for discussions on social issues like gender, race, politics, and war, then it means they’ve finally gained a level of cultural relevance on par with film and television — media that people accept as “art” because they can make statements on the human condition. To many, these kinds of discussions can stand as proof that games are not toys, and that they’re worthy of respect.

But why do gamers care what other people think?

An old stigma still follows the gaming hobby: the perception that games are “for nerds;” excessively sexist or violent, dark, or dangerous; the province of the lazy or even the maladjusted. Modern video games gleam with art and narrative potential, and fans are eager to prove it to the uninitiated. After all, if games get more respect, so will gamers.

It’s a wholly understandable thing for which to wish.

Yet on the other side of the fence stand audiences who resent these discussions. Who cares, they say, whether Braid is really about the atom bomb or if there is a moral spectrumin Grand Theft Auto? It’s only a game, some argue, and this needy clutch after “cultural legitimacy” is ruining the fun.

The idea that games should be for fun is just as valid as the idea that they should mean something. But when we debate whether or not “cultural legitimacy” is important, we’re actually tackling one more subtle question: Do we want to share video games with “outsiders” or not? The very stigma that led many to desire “legitimacy” has led just as many others to wholly reject it. When gamers react negatively to attempts to elevate the discourse around video games, and when they try to shut it down with the “it’s just a game” protest, what they’re really saying is, “we don’t want to share.”

The diversification of video games has accelerated massively over just the last few years. Now casual games are an accepted part of most people’s daily lives, the Wii has created an avenue for games even grandmothers can enjoy, social networks like Facebook are promising to re-define the definition of “multiplayer,” and the iPhone is perhaps the fastest-growing gaming platform ever.

Craving Legitimacy
The current console generation has changed what it means to be a gamer

What was once a private club accessible only to those tough enough to succeed at it —- and devoted enough to carry the stigma -– is now for everyone. Some people hate that. Some people embrace it too eagerly. But neither position is constructive, suggests Persuasive Games co-founder, author and Georgia Tech professor Ian Bogost: “The idea that games might re-figure legitimacy itself is hard and scary,” he says. “So it’s easier to ask how film, literature, or whatever has been judged legitimate, and to pretend that’s our goal. …Of course, this is a vicious circle, because the more we do that, the less we explore, adopt, accept, and naturalize what might make video games uniquely legitimate.”

In other words, we should let games be themselves — no more and no less. The old “it’s just a game” refrain that seeks to shut down discourse is just as useless as attempts to make games legitimate by demanding they be “more like” other entertainment. With so many different experiences and audiences now at play, the experience of “video game” is bound to mean different things to different people. Why not stop the circular arguments?

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Leigh Alexander

GamePro
Show Comments

Cool Tech

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?