Survey says US public doesn't support Internet regulation

Net neutrality supporters question the results of the survey from Broadband for America

Fifty-seven percent of likely voters in the U.S. don't support any Internet regulation by the federal government, according to a new survey released by Broadband for America, an advocacy group with members including AT&T and Verizon Communications.

AT&T and other groups opposed to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's ongoing effort to enact network neutrality rules pointed to the survey as evidence that the agency should not proceed with rules prohibiting broadband providers from selectively blocking or slowing Web traffic.

The Broadband for America poll didn't specifically mention the words "net neutrality," although it did ask a question about the "open Internet."

The poll asked if respondents thought the best way to ensure an open Internet is to "continue the current approach that has brought us the Internet we have today," through competition, not increased regulation. As an alternative, the poll asked if respondents preferred "additional government rules and oversight in place to ensure that Internet service providers are acting in the best interests of consumers" and not discriminating against Web content and competing services.

Sixty-three percent of respondents said they preferred the "current approach," while 30 per cent said they wanted additional government rules.

The survey, of 800 likely voters, also found that 76 per cent of respondents agreed that the Internet is currently working very or fairly well, Broadband for America said.

Of the 31 per cent of respondents who thought the government should regulate the Internet, more than two-thirds said the regulations should be focused on privacy, online safety and protecting children, Broadband for America said.

Net neutrality advocates questioned the poll, and suggested that survey respondents may not have equated net neutrality to Internet regulation. Net neutrality advocates have protested efforts to equate the two, saying net neutrality would create new rules for broadband providers, but would not regulate Internet content.

"Nobody is talking about the government regulating the Internet," said Art Brodsky, communications director for Public Knowledge, a digital rights group and net neutrality backer. "I haven't seen the poll questions, but the release was very misleading."

Derek Turner, research director at Free Press, another net neutrality supporter, called the survey an "industry-funded poll."

"The Internet is indeed working today, and that's because net neutrality is the current status quo," he said. "Keeping network operators from implementing their draconian plans to pick winners and losers online is critical to the 'Net's continued success. Other polls have shown that Americans are also overwhelmingly opposed to letting ISPs [Internet service providers] decide what content should receive priority treatment, and that's what this debate is all about."

The survey supports Broadband for America's mission, the group said in a statement. "We believe broadband access should be available and affordable for every household in the nation," it said. "These findings support our belief that the Internet should be open and secure."

The survey supports AT&T's view that the FCC should not create new net neutrality rules, said Jim Cicconi, AT&T's senior executive vice president for external and legislative affairs.

"This poll demonstrates once again what most everyone involved with the net neutrality issue already knows -- that despite the fear-mongering of a few fringe groups, the American people overwhelmingly reject the idea of government regulation in the Internet space," Cicconi said in a statement. "Tellingly, even the few who do want more government oversight are worried about very different things -- identity theft, pornography, spam and malware. The rest, by huge margins, feel the Internet is working well and reject government involvement."

Public opinion is "so clearly stacked" against proponents of net neutrality rules, he added.

Net neutrality advocates have called on the FCC to pass formal net neutrality rules after a U.S. appeals court, earlier this year, threw out an attempt by the agency to enforce informal principles in place since 2005. In that case, the FCC prohibited Comcast from slowing some peer-to-peer traffic, but the court ruled that the agency had overreached its authority.

Meanwhile, several musicians and the Writers Guild of America East sent a letter to the FCC this week, urging the agency to move forward with net neutrality rules., a liberal advocacy group and net neutrality supporter, released the letter.

"Due to the open structures of the Internet, musicians and other creators and innovators can compete on an equal technological playing field with the biggest companies," said the letter, signed by R.E.M., The Roots, Bonnie Raitt and other artists. "The result is a blossoming and legitimate marketplace that compensates creators while rewarding fans with access to an incredible array of music."

The letter urged the FCC to "act immediately to ensure that the Internet is kept free and open."

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's e-mail address is

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags governmentbroadbandregulationlegislationtelecommunicationat&tfree pressVerizon CommunicationsPublic KnowledgeArt BrodskyMoveOn.orgBonnie RaittR.E.M.Jim CicconiDerek Turner

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments



Sansai 6-Outlet Power Board + 4-Port USB Charging Station

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?