Court rules Hynix infringed on Rambus patents

A US court has ruled that certain technologies within Hynix Semiconductor's memory chips infringe upon patents held by Rambus, but a trial will still take place in March to determine whether the rest of Rambus' claims are valid.

Judge Ronald Whyte, of the US District Court for the District of Northern California, ruled in favour of Rambus on six of seven requests for summary judgement filed by both Rambus and Hynix.

Rambus had asked the judge to declare that Hynix's memory chips infringed upon Rambus patents, while Hynix had asked the judge to rule that Rambus' patents are invalid.

A ruling of summary judgment essentially skips the trial phase of a case and holds that the issues in the case are clear enough to render a decision without a trial.

Hynix had filed six requests for summary judgment, asking the judge to throw out 59 claims within assorted Rambus patents. One of those requests was granted, dismissing nine of the claims, but the other requests to invalidate the remaining 50 claims were denied.

Rambus then identified 40 claims within its patents that the company believes are infringed by Hynix's products, and asked for rulings of summary judgment on those claims.

Of those 40 claims, Judge Whyte ruled that Hynix's products infringe upon 29 of the claims, but the question of infringement on the remaining 11 claims will be debated at a trial starting March 21.

The ruling is "a major step forward" in Rambus' goal to collect royalties on memory chips, said John Danforth, Rambus' general counsel, in a statement. Representatives for Hynix were not immediately available to comment.

Rambus designs memory interfaces, the portion of a system's chipset that moves data from the processor to the memory. However, the company is better known for the legal saga that stems from a dispute over whether Rambus holds patents on the memory chips that can be found in the vast majority of the world's PCs, which could lead to billions of dollars in royalties.

Rambus believes that synchronous dynamic RAM (SDRAM) chips contain technology that it patented. The SDRAM industry has vehemently protested the validity of Rambus' claims because Rambus was a member of the industry organisation that developed the SDRAM standard, and it did not disclose its patents while the group was debating what technology would wind up in the standard.

Infineon Technologies was the first target of Rambus' patent claims. In that trial, a Virginia jury originally convicted Rambus of fraud for failing to disclose its patents, but that verdict was overturned after an appeals court ruled that the disclosure policies of the standards-setting organisation did not specifically require Rambus to disclose its patents. Emboldened by that decision, Rambus is expected to press its original argument against Infineon in a new trial this year.

This particular case was filed by Hynix after Rambus sued Infineon. Hynix makes chips based on the same standard, and it sued Rambus in this case claiming that Rambus' patents on SDRAM technology were invalid.

Rambus is still involved in four other cases, including the Infineon trial. Micron Technology also sued Rambus claiming that its patents are invalid, and the US Federal Trade Commission accused Rambus of unfair competition.

It also filed an antitrust suit against Infineon, Micron, Hynix and Siemens claiming those companies conspired to keep the price of Rambus' own memory standard (RDRAM) high while keeping the price of SDRAM low, in an attempt to keep RDRAM from catching on as a standard. The memory makers deny that charge, but executives at Infineon and Micron plead guilty to conspiring to fix the price of SDRAM in a separate investigation involving the US Department of Justice.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Tom Krazit

IDG News Service
Show Comments


James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >




Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?