Experts: Cybersecurity needs funding, organization

Members of the security industry and academia told a U.S. House of Representatives committee Wednesday that significant funding for research and the coordination of private and public sector efforts will be needed to combat the threat of cyberterrorism.

Admitting that no one really knows the scope or nature of potential attacks that could strike both private and government computer networks, the House Committee on Science's chairman Sherwood Boehlert, a Republican from New York, called for a coordinated effort to evaluate the risks at hand and develop the necessary technology and policies to prevent -- or at least minimize -- acts of cyberterrorism.

Such action requires funding, said witnesses who testified at the hearing.

"For historical reasons, no federal funding agency has assumed responsibility for supporting basic research in this area" of computer security, said William Wulf, president of the National Academy of Engineering and a professor at the University of Virginia. "Because no funding agency feels it owns this problem, relatively small, sporadic research projects have been funded, but no one has questioned the underlying assumptions on cybersecurity that were established in the 1960s mainframe environment."

It's not so much that the research community needs a lot of funding, Wulf explained, but sustained funding, since few researchers will embark on a project without knowing that money will be made available to complete it.

Terry Benzel, vice president of advanced security research with Network Associates Inc. agreed, calling for a dramatic increase in federal funding of research. Government dollars are particularly in need these days since the current economic slump has forced companies to slash their own research and development budgets. Even Network Associates -- which has seen an uptick in its stock price since the Sept. 11 attacks that pointed to an increased need for security -- can't invest as much as it used to in research, Benzel said.

Another issue among security researchers is legislation that prevents them from examining technology without fear of retribution. For example, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act makes it a federal felony to circumvent security mechanisms even when done in the name of research, said Eugene Spafford, director of Purdue University's Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security. Intellectual property laws also prohibit researchers from taking advantage of things like computer algorithms in their research, he said.

As both the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate grapple with the question of who, if any one person, organization, or agency, should be in charge of cybersecurity, members of the panel expressed differing views on the question. Wulf supported putting that responsibility under the newly created U.S. Office of Homeland Security, while Spafford suggested a coordinating body made up of representatives from the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the U.S. National Security Agency, and others could oversee security research to ensure it heads in the right direction. Benzel voiced support for developing a new organization altogether.

The House Committee on Science can be found on the Web at

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Cara Garretson

Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?