Wikileaks cable offers new insights into Oracle-Sun deal

US authorities lobbied the EU on Oracle's behalf, and the loss of MySQL would have 'destroyed' the merger, the cable reveals

US authorities met with European officials on behalf of Oracle with regard to its $US7.4 billion acquisition of Sun Microsystems, according to a US diplomatic cable recently released by activist group Wikileaks.

Oracle faced close scrutiny over the deal from EU antitrust officials. In part, regulators there were concerned over the future health of the open-source MySQL database under Oracle ownership, since Oracle's own proprietary database was already a dominant presence in corporate data centers.

In October 2009, Oracle met with U.S. officials and urged them to "push for rapid European Commission

approval of the merger," according to the Oct. 27, 2009, cable from the United States Mission to the European Union in Brussels, which was released Friday by Wikileaks.

Oracle told U.S. authorities that the EU was "pressuring it to divest MySQL as a condition for approval of the merger," a move that would "destroy" the deal, according to the cable, which was first flagged by Australian tech site iTnews.

The company was depending "on keeping MySQL to make the merger economically viable, since Oracle plans to expand the market for MySQL and its associated support contracts," the cable adds.

Moreover, "Oracle would be forced to take a huge accounting loss if it sold MySQL, since it believes that Sun overpaid in paying nearly $1 billion for MySQL in 2008, and it would only be able to sell it for a fraction of this sum," it adds.

Oracle also told U.S. officials that Sun would go bankrupt if the deal didn't go through, according to the cable.

"DOJ/Antitrust views this matter as a high priority," the cable adds. "Its senior officials and investigative staff are currently engaging productively and intensely with their [EU Directorate General for Competition] counterparts, and are in close touch with Oracle and Sun, in the hopes of preventing a divergent outcome."

EU officials approved the merger in January 2010 and it closed shortly thereafter.

An Oracle spokeswoman declined to comment on the cable's contents on Tuesday.

While closed-door entreaties from U.S. authorities may have helped ease the EU's concerns over the deal, in December 2009 Oracle also issued a list of public commitments with regard to keeping MySQL viable in a competitive marketplace.

Despite the worries Oracle reportedly raised over losing MySQL, post-merger it has seemed to focus more on Sun's hardware business, particularly for its Exadata and Exalogic data-processing and application server machines.

So far, Oracle has not appeared to go back on the commitments it made for MySQL, and the company's engineering efforts for the database have drawn high praise from some community members.

However, it is also facing a growing wave of competition from third-party companies that sell support contracts for MySQL as well as offshoot versions of the database.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris's e-mail address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags open sourceMergers and acquisitionsOraclebusiness issueslegalsoftwareSun Microsystemshardware systemsantitrust

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?