Software publishers see the Y2000 as marketing opportunity

The spectre of the year 2000 invokes many feelings among software users -- fear, anger and frustration are among the most common. It seems, however, to elicit a different response from software vendors -- in particular, evasiveness and greed.

Considering that it's been fairly well known for some time that the year 2000 will follow 1999, you might think software publishers would feel responsible for correcting year-2000 incompatibilities in their products. And many do, but that sense of responsibility generally extends only to the most recent version of the product. Customers of older versions, even ones purchased relatively recently, must upgrade.

An example of the year-2000 problem being treated as a marketing opportunity was experienced by a reader who recently received a phone call from Quarterdeck about the version of Procomm she is using.

"The call today was to let me know that Procomm, Version 4.0, is not year-2000 compliant and to offer to sell me a compliant version (4.5) at the 'manufacturer's special price of US$30'," the reader wrote. "I upgraded to Procomm 4.0 about 13 months ago. 'Excuse me,' I said, 'but why should I pay for a bug fix? Do you mean to tell me that last year you didn't know about the year-2000 problem?'"The salesperson, who did not mention any other features the upgrade provided, only responded that 4.0 is a 2-year-old version.

A representative for Quarterdeck confirmed that Procomm 4.0 users need to upgrade to 4.5 (or the just-released 4.7) for year-2000 compliance. However, I was also told that, for those who do not wish to get the other features of the upgrade, a disk with just the year-2000 patch is available for a $US9.95 shipping and handling charge. Neither the reader's salesperson, Quarterdeck's Web page, or Quarterdeck's customer service tells you about this offer.

"It's not public knowledge," the representative confirmed. "We do prefer to encourage people to upgrade to the latest version."

At least it's public knowledge now.

A common element of these year-2000 cases, both for readers and for me, is the difficulty in getting accurate information from the vendors. A system manager at an international consulting company was recently trying to get information on year-2000 compliance for Netscape's SuiteSpot 3.0. After searching the Netscape Web page in vain, and having his calls bounced from tech support to sales and back again, he finally heard from a sales representative who told him that only the latest version, SuiteSpot 3.5, will be year-2000 tested.

"The previous version (3.0) which had been shipping up until December '97, will not be tested," said the system manager. "I explained that corporate IS groups cautiously migrate to upgrades in light of the inherent bugs. ... He understood where I was coming from, yet the decision was made by their `QA' group not to test a 6-month-old product."

After first being told that the SuiteSpot 3.0 applications had been tested and found year-2000 compliant, I finally learned from Netscape that only the 3.5 versions have been tested vigorously enough to be certified.

"We found that there could be a lot of [year-2000] problems we hadn't anticipated -- protocols that were written 20 years ago, for example," said John Paul, senior vice-president for Netscape's server products division. "So certifying all those [3.5 applications] was a big expense for us." But Paul also seemed to understand where our reader was coming from in wanting to know if SuiteSpot 3.0 has year-2000 problems or not.

"That does sound like something we could do for customers, so we will seriously consider it," Paul said.

I have a few more cases I want to discuss, but they can keep. I suspect we're going to be talking about year-2000 upgrades for the next 18 months or so. By that point, perhaps even the software vendors will be exhibiting their own share of fear, anger and frustration.

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Stocking Stuffer

SmartLens - Clip on Phone Camera Lens Set of 3

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Michael Hargreaves

Microsoft Office 365/Dell XPS 15 2-in-1

I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)

Maryellen Rose George

Brother PT-P750W

It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!

Cathy Giles

Brother MFC-L8900CDW

The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.

Luke Hill


I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Laura Johnston

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin

If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?