Cybersquatters learn to beat the system

Loopholes in the Internet domain name dispute-resolution system are helping professional cybersquatters win cases, says an experienced mediator.

The warning is from Australian lawyer John Swinson, who sits on international dispute-resolution tribunals for the World Intellectual Property Organisation.

Variations in legal philosophy and interpretation among individual mediators can lead to inconsistent results where factual matters are in dispute. It appears some adjudicators won't decide in favour of complainants unless they can prove their cases 150 per cent, while others are less conservative in their attitudes.

Helping tilt the scales of justice further is the fact that cybersquatters are prone to telling porkies. "If a cybersquatter is clever at spinning a convincing story that can't be disproved in the time available to the panel, some arbitrators will give him the benefit of the doubt," says Swinson. Thus cybersquatters who learn the idiosyncrasies of the system can come out ahead by manufacturing a legitimate cover story for their activities.

"Among cybersquatters, the smart guys for whom it is a business are surviving . . . they are getting away with things."

Swinson is one of more than 200 individuals -- typically legal specialists with an interest in technology law -- accredited as arbitrators and mediators by WIPO and other businesses that provide dispute-resolution services.

"My view is there are many people out there registering domain names improperly. You can manipulate the system as a cybersquatter. They have seen where the loopholes are and manipulate them."

Swinson cites a case he adjudicated this year involving a Las Vegas resident who had registered the name The man argued it was only coincidence that he'd acquired the name after German company Schott Glas and Japanese electronics giant NEC concluded a joint venture pact.

However, detective work by Swinson showed that the Las Vegas man was in the habit of registering names of recently completed mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures. The cybersquatter had scored one victory from eight attempts but "you only need one success to make up for the failures and turn a profit", Swinson points out.

In another case, a shopping centre business in the Canadian city of Oshawa found the domain name was already registered. The respondent told the tribunal he was operating an AIDS clinic in Africa and claimed "oshawa" meant "semen" in Swahili.

The panel ruled against the respondent, but only after it discovered that oshawa does not mean semen in Swahili and that the respondent's representative lived only 20 kilometres from the Canadian shopping centre.

The case required a time extension, but since remuneration rates are only $1000 per decision, most panellists won't devote extra time to scratching below the surface of the written depositions they receive, says Swinson.

"At the end, judges have two completely different stories from the two sides and they have to make a decision on that. It is all done on paper so there is no chance to conduct a witness stand cross-examination.

"When there are two conflicting stories and it is hard to determine who is lying, a lot of judges will maintain the status quo and deny the complaint. So if a cybersquatter gets one of the judges to take the view it is all too difficult, he wins."

Swinson, 35, who took a double degree in law and computing, spent seven years with a New York law firm and now works in Australia with Mallesons Stephen Jaques.

Overall, the dispute-resolution system is working well but requires fine-tuning to close off loopholes, says Swinson. "But I am concerned that in a number of cases I've seen, cybersquatters are submitting false evidence to show they have a legitimate interest in a domain name."

Disputes aren't dropping in frequency. Cases filed so far this year with WIPO alone are running slightly ahead of last year's 1841 disputes in generic top-level domains such as .com.

WIPO is one of four organisations licensed by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers to mediate cases under Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution rules.

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Pete Young

Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Luke Hill


I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Laura Johnston

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin

If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?