Oracle resists Google's demand for $4 million in court costs

The case's mixed results means each side should pay their own freight, Oracle argues

Oracle and Google are at loggerheads over some US$4 million in court costs Google wants Oracle to pay in connection with its patent and copyright lawsuit over the Android mobile OS.

Earlier this month, Google demanded that amount from Oracle as reimbursement for expert witness fees, document production and other expenses, arguing that it deserved as much since on balance, Google largely prevailed.

Since that time, Oracle met with Google but "the parties were not able to reach an agreement," Oracle said in a filing late Monday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Oracle had alleged that Android violated copyrights and patents it holds on the Java programming language.

Earlier this year, the jury in the case found that Google hadn't violated Oracle's patents. It also found that Google had infringed on Oracle's Java copyrights, but deadlocked on whether those actions were protected under "fair use."

Meanwhile, a key issue in the trial revolved around whether APIs (application programming interfaces) were subject to copyright. Judge William Alsup ultimately ruled that the ones at issue in the case were not.

All of this means that Oracle shouldn't have to shell out the $4 million Google is demanding, Oracle said in its filing.

"First, because the key disputed issues concerning API copyrightability were close, complex, without direct precedent, and of great importance to the computer software industry, and neither Oracle nor Google prevailed on all claims in this case, the Court should exercise its discretion to deny costs and allow each party to bear its own expenses," Oracle said. "Denial of costs is particularly appropriate where the issues are close, difficult, and of public importance, and where the judgment is mixed."

Google's estimated costs for document production could be inflated as well, Oracle alleged: "The charges cover all processing of documents by [Google vendor] FTI and all labor of its personnel, with no attempt to separate the reasonable cost of copying documents for production from the non-taxable costs of services provided for Google's litigation convenience (such as organizing and searching the productions)."

In any event, the court should definitely deny Google's demand that Oracle pay Google's share of the fees paid to Dr. James Kearl, the court-appointed expert witness in the case, according to Oracle.

"The parties previously agreed, and the Court ordered, that these costs would be borne 'one half by each party,'" Oracle said. "Google's attempt to now shift all of Dr. Kearl's fees and expenses to Oracle is contrary to that agreement and order."

Meanwhile, it's not clear when the companies' overarching disagreements over Android will be resolved, as Oracle is expected to appeal Alsup's ruling on the APIs.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris's e-mail address is

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?