Digital rights activist: EU's proposed net neutrality law 'as useful as an umbrella in a hurricane'

The proposal will hamper rather than guarantee net neutrality, activists contend

The European Union's proposed net neutrality law allows different price plans for different Internet speeds to the detriment of net neutrality, digital activists said Wednesday.

Without the proposed law, 96 percent of Europeans would be without any legal framework at all for net neutrality, said Digital Agenda Commissioner Neelie Kroes, who drew up the draft law presented Wednesday. Only the Netherlands and Slovenia have net neutrality laws.

The text explicitly bans ISPs from blocking and throttling content and gives consumers the freedom to terminate contracts with ISPs that don't deliver the speeds subscribers pay for, Kroes said. Article 23 of the proposed law bans ISPs from "blocking, slowing down, degrading or discriminating against specific content, applications or services." Except in cases where it is necessary to apply reasonable traffic management measures in order to "implement a court order, prevent serious crimes, preserve the integrity and security of the network or minimize the effects of temporary or exceptional network congestion."

However, net neutrality advocates said that Article 23 leaves the door open for a two-tiered Internet by allowing ISPs to offer speeds at different rates through "specialized services with a defined quality of service or dedicated capacity."

The proposal stipulates that such services "shall not impair in a recurring or continuous manner the general quality of Internet access services," which Kroes said will guarantee an open Internet for everyone.

But not everyone is convinced.

"We are concerned that market interest in 'specialized services' could lead to uneven allocation of resources and degrade services offered over the Internet. Iron-clad guarantees are needed to ensure continued investment in the non-discriminatory part of the network," said Mael Brunet, head of OpenForum Europe in Brussels.

"The text on net neutrality achieves exactly the opposite of net neutrality -- giving the opportunity to fragment Internet connections between a fast lane and a slow lane. As Commissioner Kroes correctly said in 2010 ... commercially motivated discrimination is 'an absolute no go.' She has now proposed legislation to facilitate commercially motivated discrimination," said European digital rights group EDRi spokesman Joe McNamee.

"Anyone with even a passing knowledge of the functioning of how regulation is imposed on a national level in the E.U. will know that the provisions that have been proposed will be about as useful as an umbrella in a hurricane," said McNamee.

The proposed law also gives national regulatory authorities the power "to impose minimum quality of service requirements" on ISPs.

Digital rights activists say the text would also allow content providers, such as Google or Facebook, to pay ISPs to guarantee high speeds for their services.

However, Digital Agenda Spokesman Ryan Heath said that such deals are already available and that, in fact, the proposed law offers consumers more options and protects the open Internet.

"Companies should be allowed to differentiate their offers and compete on enhanced quality of service, provided this is done in an non-discriminatory manner. There is nothing unusual in this -- postal services (express delivery) and airlines (economy versus business class) have done this for decades," he said in a statement. "The difference under this proposed regulation is consumers would have the guaranteed right to walk away if their net neutrality is breached."

The debate seems to stem from different definitions of net neutrality. The proposed law uses the term only once, referring instead to "open Internet." The text will now go to the European Parliament, which will almost certainly make changes based on politicians' understanding of the term.

Follow Jennifer on Twitter at @BrusselsGeek or email tips and comments to jennifer_baker@idg.com.

Join the newsletter!

Or
Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags governmentregulationinternetOpenForum Europe

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jennifer Baker

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Essentials

James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >

Mobile

Exec

Budget

Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?