Oracle says Oregon governor spiked Obamacare site for political reasons

Oregon and Oracle are likely headed to a battle in court over Cover Oregon

The battle between Oracle and Oregon officials over the state's Cover Oregon health insurance exchange site is raging on, with the vendor now claiming the exchange was functional in February, but Governor John Kitzhaber decided to dump it for political reasons.

Portland television station KATU-2 unearthed a PowerPoint presentation Oracle officials used to brief members of the U.S. House and Energy Committee last week. In the document, Oracle states the site was fixed and ready for rollout in February, but that officials "would not permit it."

The House committee asked the Government Accountability Office to investigate Cover Oregon, which the state spent more than US$200 million to build.

Oregon appears close to filing a lawsuit against Oracle in hopes of getting back the money it paid the company. Kitzhaber has been a strong public proponent of suing Oracle, saying it failed to deliver a working product.

Oracle has made public statements suggesting it will put up a vigorous defense should a lawsuit occur, and the presentation to lawmakers could be a preview of its legal strategy.

"Oracle can only conclude that the Governor's unwillingness to release the website is because doing so doesn't fit with his re-election strategy of blaming Oracle for his own mistakes," the presentation states.

Cover Oregon was supposed to go live Oct. 1 along with the national Healthcare.gov site, but was wracked by severe performance and stability problems.

The resulting fallout led to the departure of a number of state officials and a rash of political finger-pointing, particularly involving Kitzhaber, a Democrat who is up for re-election this year. Oregon recently decided to move enrollment to the federal exchange, Healthcare.gov, which also experienced initial performance problems but was subsequently stabilized.

A key issue of contention is the fact that Oregon served as its own systems integrator on the project, and hired Oracle consultants on an hourly basis. Oracle has maintained that the state badly mismanaged the project and that an investigation will "completely exonerate" the vendor.

But one federal investigative report already completed found blame to be had on both the state and Oracle's part.

Oregon hired Deloitte to examine the relative costs of fixing the site Oracle helped build, compared to moving to the federal exchange, and found the latter option would be only several million dollars, compared to nearly $80 million.

The estimate Deloitte made to fix the exchange is "grossly inflated" and based partly "on Deloitte's lack of experience with certain functional areas and their desire to replace those portions of the existing system with their own custom approach," Oracle said in the presentation.

A Deloitte spokesman declined to comment on Oracle's claims on Monday.

A spokeswoman for Kitzhaber didn't respond to a request for comment.

However, the governor's office provided a statement to KATU, saying that "after repeated testing from October 2013 to February 2014 and failures of the website to perform at minimal levels, Cover Oregon leadership, Cover Oregon's Board and Governor Kitzhaber made the decision (not to deploy the site)."

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris' email address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Join the newsletter!

Or
Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags governmentOraclebusiness issueslegalservicessoftwareDeloitteindustry verticalsCivil lawsuitsGovernment use of IT

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Essentials

James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >

Mobile

Sansai 6-Outlet Power Board + 4-Port USB Charging Station

Learn more >

Exec

Budget

Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?