Senate committee: Mobile phone 'cramming' widespread, profits carriers

Unauthorized third-party billing has cost U.S. mobile phone customers hundreds of millions of dollars, a report says

Mobile carriers have pulled in hundreds of millions in profits through third-party charges tacked onto customers' bills without their consent, according to a report from a U.S. Senate committee.

The carriers have been slow to act against scammers tacking third-party charges onto mobile bills even after thousands of complaints by customers and investigations by multiple state attorneys general during the past six years, said the staff report from the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, released Wednesday.

While the mobile industry has suggested unauthorized third-party billing -- often called cramming -- is a minor problem, the practice has been "widespread and has likely cost consumers hundreds of millions of dollars," according to the committee staff report.

Third-party billing on mobile phone bills has been "a billion dollar industry that has yielded tremendous revenues for carriers," the committee report said. The four largest U.S. carriers -- AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon -- generally take 30 to 40 percent of the cut for third-party services, often tacked on as charges of less than US$10 a month, but continuing indefinitely, the report said.

Those four carriers had assured the committee they were taking "robust" steps to combat a minor problem with mobile cramming when the committee began asking about the issue, said Senator John "Jay" Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat.

"There is now overwhelming evidence that these statements were just not true -- cramming on wireless phones has been widespread and has caused consumers substantial harm," Rockefeller said in a statement.

Carriers had little incentive to crack down on third-party billing schemes, said Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat. "I don't think the telephone companies were happy or content that crammers were defrauding their customers," he said. "But they almost certainly welcomed the revenue that third-party billing was generating for them."

Mobile carriers have taken several steps to end cramming, countered Michael Altschul, senior vice president and general counsel at mobile trade group CTIA. Last November, the large U.S. carriers agreed to stop billing for most premium short message services [PSMS], one of the major third-party billing options, he said.

Carriers are also actively monitoring for third-party billing fraud and keeping a close eye on short-code campaigns on mobile phones, Altschul said. CTIA and its members have developed guidelines for third-party billing, but found that "trust alone was not sufficient to ensure compliance," he said. "The industry recognized that wireless customers and carriers were being victimized by determined fraudsters who crafted elaborate schemes to defeat the industry's self regulation and third-party monitoring."

Blumenthal asked what segment of the mobile industry should take responsibility for monitoring third-party billing. Carriers are taking responsibility, Altschul said.

After the carriers ended support for third-party PSMS billing, customer complaints about unauthorized billing have fallen dramatically, with less than 2 percent of third-party billing now generating complaints, Altschul said.

There's been "wrongdoing at every stage" of the third-party billing market, Blumenthal said, including carriers, billing aggregators and companies providing content such as horoscopes or celebrity gossip.

The committee report suggested carriers have been slow to react to cramming.

"The wireless industry was on notice at least as early as 2008 about significant wireless cramming concerns and problems with third-party vendor marketing tactics, yet carriers' anti-cramming policies and sometimes lax oversight left wide gaps in consumer protection," the committee report said.

In some cases, carriers allowed third-party vendors to continue billing consumers even when more than 50 percent of vendor revenues were refunded because of customer complaints, the report said.

The committee's report and hearing came just weeks after the U.S. Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint against T-Mobile USA accusing the carrier of making millions of dollars on third-party billing while ignoring many customer complaints.

T-Mobile has disputed the FTC's allegations.

The FTC's action against T-Mobile is the agency's first against a carrier, although it has filed about 30 complaints related to cramming in the last 15 years.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags governmentmobileregulationtelecommunication3g4gsprintat&tU.S. Federal Trade CommissionVerizon CommunicationsT-Mobile USARichard BlumenthalJohn "Jay" RockefellerMichael Altschul

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?