Supreme Court to hear Grokster case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a case focusing on whether peer-to-peer (P-to-P) software vendors should be penalized for unauthorized file trading when their software is used.

The Supreme Court decision follows rulings by lower courts that P-to-P vendors aren't liable for copyright violations committed by users of their services. In August, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled unanimously to uphold a lower court ruling that P-to-P companies Grokster, StreamCast Networks and were not liable for users' copyright violations.

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the Motion Picture Association of America applauded the Supreme Court's decision. The two trade groups, along with the National Music Publisher's Association of America, brought the original lawsuit against P-to-P services, but a district court judge dismissed the case in April 2003.

By allowing P-to-P services to continue operating, the courts disadvantaged so-called legitimate services, Mitch Bainwol, RIAA chairman and chief executive officer, said in a statement. P-to-P vendors should be able to filter copyrighted material on their networks, just as most P-to-P vendors now filter out viruses, he added.

"We appreciate that the Supreme Court has agreed to review this case," he added. "There are seminal issues before the court -- the future of the creative industries and legitimate Internet commerce. These are questions not about a particular technology, but the abuse of that technology by practitioners of a parasitical business model. Bad actors who have hijacked a legitimate technology for illegitimate means must be held accountable."

P-to-P vendors have argued that the music industry refuses to license its products to them and instead has focused on suing P-to-P users. Since September 2003, the RIAA has filed more than 7,000 lawsuits against alleged file traders.

Public Knowledge, an intellectual property advocacy group, called on the Supreme Court to act consistently with its ruling in the 1984 Sony vs. Universal City Studios case. In that case, involving VCR technology, the court decided that makers of technologies that have significant noninfringing uses could not be held liable for copyright violations committed by their customers.

"The Sony case is at the heart of the technological growth for the last 20 years," said Gigi B. Sohn, president of Public Knowledge. "Now is not the time to hamper it or crimp it in any way."

It's understandable why the Supreme Court would want to hear the Grokster case because it's interesting, Sohn said. "I do hope the court confirms what the district court said -- that is, technologies are disruptive, and (entertainment) companies always manage to respond to them," she added.

Sohn and Adam Eisgrau, executive director of trade group P2P United, said the Supreme Court's decision to take the case doesn't mean it's likely that the court will overturn the lower courts' decisions. Grokster and StreamCast, distributor of the Morpheus P-to-P software, are both members of P2P United. was a site operated by StreamCast. Eisgrau expressed optimism based on the Ninth Circuit's legal reasoning and the precedence of the Sony case.

"We are confident the court will find a path that will not stymie innovation in the interest of parochial entertainment groups," Eisgrau said.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?