US DoJ, 20 states file suits against Microsoft

The US Department of Justice (DoJ) as well as attorneys general from 20 US states and the District of Columbia today filed antitrust lawsuits against Microsoft, saying that the company's business practices risk putting a "chokehold" on the software industry.

The DoJ's suit, filed in US District Court, accuses Microsoft of unfairly using the monopoly advantage it has with its Windows operating system to gain a larger share of other software markets, including Internet browsers.

Damage is already occurring in the marketplace, computer manufacturers are being denied options and "products are being forced through the stream of commerce," said assistant US attorney general Joel Klein at a press conference.

"This action is intended to ensure that consumers and the computer manufacturers have the right to choose which software they want installed and not have that software chosen for them," said Janet Reno, US attorney general.

The government suit does not seek to block the software giant from releasing Windows '98, but it would require Microsoft to include archrival Netscape Communications' Internet browser with Microsoft's Internet Explorer (IE) in Windows 98, which was just released to PC makers and is due out commercially in June. If Microsoft does not want to include Netscape, it must unbundle IE from Windows '98.

The DoJ and state lawsuits overlapped on the following demands:

-- The end of Microsoft's practice of forcing Windows 98 purchasers to take Microsoft's Internet browser. If Microsoft insists on including its browser in Windows 98 it should also include Netscape's browser. If Microsoft does not include Netscape's browser, it must unbundle its own browser.

-- The requirement that Microsoft give computer manufacturers the right to install their own first screen at the conclusion of the initial bootup sequence.

-- Require Microsoft to give computer manufacturers additional options for installing browser software on new computers.

-- Forbid Microsoft from enforcing contractual provisions that require providers of Internet and online services and Internet content providers to limit their distribution and promotion of competing browsersThe DoJ and the states based their cases on internal documents from Microsoft and statements from company officials, according to DoJ officials.

The attorneys general from New York, Iowa and Connecticut participated in a press conference announcing the move.

"Our objective is not to protect any single competitor in the software or any other part of the industry," said Richard Blumenthal, the Connecticut state attorney general. "It is to provide a level playing field and choices for consumers unencumbered by the kinds of exclusionary tactics that Microsoft has exploited by virtue of its dominant position," said Blumenthal.

The moves come after negotiations between Microsoft and US state and federal prosecutors and collapsed over the weekend. Microsoft said yesterday that talks came to an impasse because the government wants Microsoft to "abandon its principle of product innovation." The company particularly took umbrage with the option presented by government prosecutors that Microsoft offer rival software in its operating system bundle.

The lawsuits expand on an October, 1997 complaint filed by the DoJ in federal court, which maintained that Microsoft was violating a 1995 consent decree by forcing PC makers to include the IE browser as a condition of licensing Windows 95.

A spokesman for the European Commission said this morning that the EC plans no separate action against Microsoft in light of the US suits.

"We have left the floor to the American authorities not because we're not interested, but because the US has a greater ability to act," said Stefan Rating, spokesman for European Competition Commissioner Karel Van Miert.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?