Ashley Madison coding blunder made over 11 million passwords easy to crack

The Web site's developers forgot about early users when they implemented strong password hashing three years ago

Until today, the creators of the hacked AshleyMadison.com infidelity website appeared to have done at least one thing well: protect user passwords with a strong hashing algorithm. That belief, however, was painfully disproved by a group of hobbyist password crackers.

The 16-man team, called CynoSure Prime, sifted through the Ashley Madison source code that was posted online by hackers and found a major error in how passwords were handled on the website.

They claim that this allowed them to crack over 11 million of the 36 million password hashes stored in the website's database, which has also been leaked.

A few weeks ago such a feat seemed impossible because security experts quickly observed from the leaked data that Ashley Madison stored passwords in hashed form -- a common security practice -- using a cryptographic function called bcrypt.

Hashing is a form of one-way encryption. A clear text string, like a password, is run through an algorithm, typically multiple times, in order to generate a unique string of characters that serves as its representation. The procedure is not supposed to be reversible unless the algorithm is flawed.

However, recovering the original password from a hash is sometimes possible by using brute-force methods. This is known as hash cracking and involves running a very large number of possible passwords through the exact same algorithm that was used to generate the original hashes and looking for matches.

The success of such efforts depends on many factors: the type of hashing function used, its implementation, whether additional secret values called salts were added to the passwords, the complexity of the passwords themselves and the hardware resources available to the attackers.

Bcrypt is more computationally intensive than some other functions like MD5, which favors performance over brute-force protection. In addition, the Ashley Madison developers used a cost factor of 12 in their implementation, meaning that each possible password an attacker wants to test needs to be put through 4,096 rounds of hashing.

This makes cracking, even with an average-size dictionary -- a collection of common passwords -- and a very powerful hardware rig, very slow. The larger the dictionary the greater the chance of findings matches, but the slower the process.

A security expert named Dean Pierce made an attempt on the first 6 million Ashley Madison hashes using a list of plain text passwords leaked from game publisher RockYou in 2009. After five days he managed to crack only 4,000 hashes. That's 0.06 percent.

Researchers from antivirus vendor Avast tried as well and let their hash-cracking rig run for two weeks. The result: 26,994 recovered passwords, of which only 1,064 were unique -- used by a single user.

The CynoSure Prime team realized that attempting to brute-force the bcrypt hashes will not get them much further, so they started to look for possible errors in how passwords were handled on the website.

A variable called $loginkey piqued their interest. The team found two locations in the code where it was generated, but in slightly different ways.

In one instance $loginkey was generated upon account creation and was defined as the MD5 hash of two other variables: one holding the username and one holding the bcrypt hash of the user's password.

This made the team wonder if the password variable had always been defined as the password's hash. Digging through old code changes they found that prior to June 2012, the variable was actually using the user's plain text password.

It also turned out that when the Ashley Madison developers later implemented bcrypt hashing, they didn't bother regenerating the loginkey variables for early users.

"This meant that we could crack accounts created prior to this date with simple salted MD5," the team said in a blog post. Also, the old code converted the password to lowercase characters before using it, reducing the number of possible characters in a password to 26 and making it faster to brute-force it, they said.

The second instance of $loginkey generation used a combination of the username, password and email variables, plus a constant. This method of generating the $loginkey was used when a user modified their account attributes -- username, password or email.

However, as in the first case, it hadn't always used the bcrypt password hash as the password variable. This meant that the CynoSure team could now recover passwords for accounts that had been modified prior to the code change in 2012.

By creating rules in their MD5 hash cracking program, the team managed to isolate the securely generated, post-2012, loginkey variables from the insecure ones. Just a few hours later, they had already cracked 2.6 million passwords and after a few days, 11.2 million.

Avid Life Media, the company that owns AshleyMadison.com, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The issue, though, poses significant online security risks for a very large number of Ashley Madison users who might have used the same password on other websites and haven't changed it since then. Past breaches have shown that password reuse is rampant on the Internet.

The incident should also serve as a lesson to other developers: When you implement a new security feature in your website or application, make sure that it's applied to everyone, not just new users.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Lucian Constantin

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Father’s Day Gift Guide

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Luke Hill

MSI GT75 TITAN

I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Laura Johnston

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin

If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?