Facebook privacy class action heads to Europe's top court -- sort of

The Court of Justice of the European Union has been asked by Austria's Supreme Court to rule on a jurisdictional question

A class-action-style lawsuit accusing Facebook of targeting advertising based on allegedly illegally processed personal data is heading for the European Union's highest court.

However, the Court of Justice of the EU is not being asked to rule on the substance of the case.

Instead, the Austrian Supreme Court has asked the CJEU to clarify whether someone who has become famous for their litigation of privacy rights can sue a company as an ordinary consumer under Austrian law.

The someone in question is Max Schrems, the man whose insistence that the Irish Data Protection Commissioner pay attention to his complaint against Facebook ultimately led to the biggest change in European privacy regulation in recent history. Unhappy with the DPC's initial dismissal of his complaint, Schrems took his appeal all the way to the High Court of Ireland, which referred questions of law to the CJEU. In its response, the CJEU unexpectedly invalidated the Safe Harbor Framework governing transatlantic transfers of personal information, forcing its replacement by Privacy Shield.

Now another case initiated by Schrems is on its way to the CJEU, he said Monday.

This one, filed in August 2014 his native Austria, accuses Facebook of "unjust enrichment" by targeting advertising at its users based on what Schrems says is illegal handling of their personal data.

Schrems' complaint concerns Facebook's treatment of his personal data -- but he also invited other Facebook users to assign him the right to pursue Facebook for its treatment of their personal data. Over 25,000 people responded, according to the site fbclaim.com, turning the case into an Austrian-style class-action.

Over the last two years the case bounced from Commercial Court to Regional Court in Vienna, through the Higher Regional Court and then all the way to the Supreme Court, as Facebook sought to have the case dismissed on technical and jurisdictional grounds.

Facebook's most recent argument has been that Schrems is not eligible to sue it as a consumer in the Austrian courts because he has become a professional litigant. It says he has been paid to write books and give lectures as a result of his lawsuits against the company.

The Supreme Court thinks that Articles 15 and 16 of a December 2000 ruling from the Council of the EU, "on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters," applies in this case.

Article 15 says, among other things, that a person is considered to be a consumer if he has entered into a contract "for a purpose which can be regarded as being outside his trade or profession."

The Supreme Court has asked the CJEU to determine whether Schrems can still be considered a consumer in the light of the activities highlighted by Facebook.

Pending the CJEU's ruling, the Supreme Court's decision on jurisdiction is stayed. If it says that the case can go ahead, then it's back to the lower courts to hear arguments about the substance of the case.

By the time that happens, the EU's new General Data Protection Regulation could well have entered force, changing once again the rules on who has jurisdiction in European privacy cases.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Peter Sayer

IDG News Service
Show Comments


James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >


Sansai 6-Outlet Power Board + 4-Port USB Charging Station

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?