Rambus 'deception' could cost $3B, FTC claims in appeal

Rambus stands to gain up to $US3 billion in royalties as a result of its allegedly deceptive actions before a memory standards-setting committee, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said in a brief last week arguing for a reversal of a decision earlier this year favouring Rambus.

In February, FTC Chief Administrative Law Judge, Stephen McGuire, ruled that Rambus was not liable for its failing to disclose during discussions with the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council Solid State Technology Association (JEDEC) that it had patents for technology that became part of a new JEDEC standard for memory technology.

The full Commission will now decide whether to hear an appeal claiming that Rambus illegally obtained a monopoly "through exclusionary means" in securing patents for SDRAM (synchronous dynamic RAM) and DDR (double date rate) SDRAM, the most commonly used form of memory in PCs. FTC lawyers filed the appeal earlier this month, and made the brief public last week.

The FTC is an independent federal agency created by the US Congress to deal with allegations of unfair competition or business practices. FTC administrative law judges are independent, but work for the commission. Decisions by the administrative law judge may be appealed by either side to the full Commission and the Commission's decision can then be appealed at the federal court level.

Rambus claims that it disclosed the patented technology to a number of industry companies, including memory makers Micron Technology and Hitachi, prior to the JEDEC standards-setting discussions. It has also claimed that the disclosure policies of JEDEC were poorly defined and did not specify exactly what the company was required to disclose to the standards committee.

A federal appeals court in a separate Rambus case against Infineon Technologies AG as well as Judge McGuire have agreed with Rambus' position.

The FTC and other SDRAM memory makers say the company deceived JEDEC by failing to disclose its patents and improperly influenced the committee into adopting patented Rambus technology into the SDRAM standard.

"The force of the deceptively captured JEDEC standards, not Rambus’s ability to triumph in the open marketplace, today allows Rambus to command the monopoly power it unquestionably enjoys: the power to reap from $1-3 billion in royalties, ultimately from consumers," the FTC wrote in its appeal brief.

In the 1990s, Rambus attempted to launch a new memory standard with the backing of Intel called Rambus DRAM (RDRAM).

RDRAM is a high-speed memory interface that also comes with a hefty price tag. The low-cost and competitive performance of the SDRAM standard, coupled with problems on Intel's part in delivering RDRAM chipsets in a timely fashion, eventually won over consumers and PC companies in 2000.

Only after it became clear that RDRAM would not be the next memory standard did Rambus reveal that it held patents for certain technology contained within the SDRAM standard and the DDR SDRAM standard, the FTC wrote in its appeal brief.

Rambus should have known during the standards setting process that it was required to disclose its patents to the group, because the JEDEC chairman opened every meeting with a reminder that participants should indicate their intent to patent the technologies under consideration for the SDRAM standard, the FTC wrote.

Once Rambus realised that SDRAM vendors would retaliate against its plans to enforce its patents with legal action, Rambus executives authorised what the FTC called Shred Day 1998, in which thousands of documents were destroyed, the FTC said.

Rambus has admitted to destroying a number of documents, but said the actions were part of a routine policy that was not linked to impending litigation.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Tom Krazit

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Bang and Olufsen Beosound Stage - Dolby Atmos Soundbar

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Sony WF-1000XM3 Wireless Noise Cancelling Headphones

Learn more >

Nakamichi Delta 100 3-Way Hi Fi Speaker System

Learn more >

ASUS ROG, ACRONYM partner for Special Edition Zephyrus G14

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Mario Kart Live: Home Circuit for Nintendo Switch

Learn more >

Philips Sonicare Diamond Clean 9000 Toothbrush

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Teac 7 inch Swivel Screen Portable DVD Player

Learn more >

SunnyBunny Snowflakes 20 LED Solar Powered Fairy String

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Tom Pope

Dynabook Portégé X30L-G

Ultimately this laptop has achieved everything I would hope for in a laptop for work, while fitting that into a form factor and weight that is remarkable.

Tom Sellers

MSI P65

This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.

Lolita Wang

MSI GT76

It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.

Jack Jeffries

MSI GS75

As the Maserati or BMW of laptops, it would fit perfectly in the hands of a professional needing firepower under the hood, sophistication and class on the surface, and gaming prowess (sports mode if you will) in between.

Taylor Carr

MSI PS63

The MSI PS63 is an amazing laptop and I would definitely consider buying one in the future.

Christopher Low

Brother RJ-4230B

This small mobile printer is exactly what I need for invoicing and other jobs such as sending fellow tradesman details or step-by-step instructions that I can easily print off from my phone or the Web.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?