AOL-Time Warner merger gets the nod

The FTC voted 5-0 to allow AOL and Time Warner to combine and create a new- and old-media powerhouse that is expected to generate revenues of over $US40 billion a year and present dozens of popular music, television, movie and print offerings. The deal, originally valued at more than $US160 billion, is worth closer to $US110 billion today because of the huge drop in AOL's share price since January, when the deal was announced.

The deal has already been approved by shareholders and regulators in Europe, but the US Federal Communications Commission is still conducting its review. FCC officials have said they will complete their work by yearend. Though the agency may impose some additional conditions, it is expected to approve the transaction.

AOL Time Warner competitors ranging from Walt Disney and Microsoft to tiny Internet service providers complained that the deal would reduce competition and give AOL and Time Warner too much control over the evolving broadband and interactive television markets. Time Warner is the second-largest cable television provider, with wires passing 20 million American homes, and AOL is by far the largest Internet service provider, with almost 30 million customers in the US including its Compuserve service.

Staff of the FTC originally recommended that the agency go to court to block the deal unless the companies made substantial concession on the broadband and interactive TV issues. After months of negotiations, the companies and the agency finally reached agreement on a series of complex conditions.

All along, AOL and Time Warner had agreed that they would allow competing ISPs to offer high-speed Internet service over Time Warner's cable lines. The companies even struck a deal with Earthlink, the second-largest ISP, guaranteeing Earthlink a place on Time Warner's systems.

Thursday's agreement went further, prohibiting the merger partners from offering high-speed AOL service until it could accommodate Earthlink. And once the companies offer AOL, they would have to add at least two more independent ISPs within 90 days in large markets. Other ISPs could also be added. The companies could turn away additional ISPs only because of capacity constraints, technical limitations or a downturn in the cable broadband market.

The FTC was also worried that AOL would abandon its deals with some of the regional Bell companies to offer a high-speed Internet service over those companies' telephone lines using a technology called Digital Subscriber Line service. DSL is the leading competitor to cable high-speed service in most areas. So AOL agreed to price and market its DSL offering comparably to its cable Internet service in areas where both are offered.

Under the agreement, AOL and Time Warner may not limit or block any Internet content offered by competitors over their cable systems.

Regarding interactive television, the FTC took a more general approach. Though major American cable companies have been experimenting with interactive TV market for more than a decade, no one has yet found an approach to attract hordes of viewers. AOL is offering its own interactive service, AOLTV, but without much of a marketing push so far.

Under Thursday's agreement, if AOL allows its customers to access information through its interactive TV service, it may not block parts of broadcasts that contain interactivity that could be accessed by competitors' services. AOL must also inform the FTC of any complaints from ISPs or television programmers about content access issues.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Aaron Pressman

PC World
Show Comments

Father’s Day Gift Guide

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Luke Hill

MSI GT75 TITAN

I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Laura Johnston

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin

If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?