MS appeals brief blasts break-up ruling

Calling the entire proceeding "infected with error," the company argued in the brief that because of a variety of factual, legal and procedural errors, the ruling should be reversed. Microsoft said that the ruling would harm, rather than encourage innovation.

"Revealing a profound misunderstanding of the antitrust laws, the district court condemned Microsoft's competitive response to the phenomenal growth of the Internet and the emergence of Netscape as a platform competitor," Microsoft argued. "Far from violating the antitrust laws, Microsoft's conduct was procompetitive, producing enormous consumer benefits."

The brief's attack spread across a broad legal canvas. It asserted that Jackson's speaking tour after the trial, "together with his improper handling of the litigation" coloured public perception of the case, "undermin[ing] all confidence in the integrity of the proceedings."

In the brief, Microsoft claims that Windows and Internet Explorer are not separate products "because there are significant benefits to the integrated design of Windows that cannot be duplicated by combining an operating system with a stand-alone Web browser like Navigator."

The appeals court ordered Microsoft to present its brief -- not to exceed 150 pages -- on November 27. It subsequently ordered a 25-page joint "friend of the court" brief from the Association for Competitive Technology and the Computing Technology Industry Association also to be presented Monday, along with a joint brief from the Association for Objective Law and the Centre for the Moral Defense of Capitalism.

The court scheduled the US government to file its reply 12 January, 2001.

Jackson ruled on 7 June that Microsoft had used its dominance in operating systems to quash competition. Adopting the proposal of US Department of Justice prosecutors, he ruled Microsoft must be broken up into two separate companies.

One company would own the Windows operating system -- subject to conduct restrictions -- while the other would own applications, including the Microsoft Office suite of software applications and the Internet Explorer Web browser. Jackson's final judgment stayed the breakup until the end of the appeals process.

Microsoft's brief asserts that "the district court's so-called 'conduct' remedies -- particularly the forced disclosure of Microsoft's intellectual property and regulation of Microsoft's operating system design -- are punitive and excessive in relation to the asserted antitrust violations, and these remedies will harm, rather than benefit, consumers."

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.
Show Comments

Father’s Day Gift Guide

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Luke Hill

MSI GT75 TITAN

I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Laura Johnston

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin

If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?