MS/DoJ: Boeing wants to pick browser

A decision by Boeing to standardise on a version of Windows 95 that doesn't include Internet Explorer, became a central point in the US Government's attack on Microsoft in court yesterday.

In week five of the Microsoft antitrust trial, the government presented excerpts of the videotaped testimony of Scott Vesey, a Windows product manager at the aircraft maker, to buttress testimony of government witness Glenn Weadock, a computer consultant and computer author.

Weadock, president of a one-man consulting company, Independent Software in Colorado, and a US Justice Department (DoJ) consultant, argued during his day and half of testimony that companies want a choice in browser technology to reduce support and training costs and ensure a common platform.

"Companies do want to be able to choose what sort of software they want to put on their machines," said Weadock.

Vesey's testimony seem to fit Weadock's contentions like a glove. Vesey was originally listed as a witness for the government, but the government, instead, decided to rely on his videotape excerpts.

Vesey testified said that Boeing standardised on Netscape 2.02 because it could run across more computer platforms than Microsoft's browser, and would provide a common user experience when viewing documents.

"In the same way that we would want to be able to choose what graphics editor or what HTML editing product, or what word processor we're using, we would want to be able to choose what Web browser we're using for those same business reasons," said Vesey.

But Vesey, under questions from the Microsoft attorney in a portion of the videotape they played, also acknowledged that having a browser integrated into Windows could provide advantages.

Boeing has installed an earlier version of Windows 95 that doesn't include Explorer, and uses Netscape Navigator as its standard browser. But the company could lose that ability to keep Internet Explorer off desktop PCs in the future.

The government introduced an internal Boeing document, written by Vesey in September, that asks: "Why Internet Explorer 5.0?" And then answers: "We do not have a choice. Internet Explorer will be installed as a component of our next generation desktop operating system."

The government also cited an e-mail by PC maker Gateway executive Jim VonHolle to a Microsoft manager in April, 1998, seeking the ability to remove Internet Explorer if a customer requests it.

"We want IE to have uninstall for as much as the code as can be removed without disabling the system," VanHolle said.

Mark Murray, Microsoft spokesman, said at the noon recess that there is "absolutely no legal basis" for the government to tell a software marker how to design its products.

Murray said that by making the earlier version of Windows 95 available to customers, Microsoft is offering them choice. But he offered no guarantees that option would remain available in the future.

David Boies, the lead government attorney, said availability of the older software was not "choice" and noted that Microsoft could stop offering it, at its discretion, under its contracts with PC equipment manufacturers.

The government is also expected to call John Soyring, director of network computing software services at IBM, as a witness after Weadock. Soyring's written testimony, in which he alleges that Microsoft contracts have kept developers from writing programs for IBM's OS/2 operating system, has been released by the Justice Department.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?