Microsoft files rebuttal

Microsoft is accused by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and 19 US states of illegally using its dominance in PC desktop operating systems to try to quash competition in other areas, such as the market for Web browsers.

In effect, Microsoft document is a rebuttal of the government's rebuttal of the software company's legal defense.

Once again, as the firm has done in previous filings in the case, Microsoft defended itself using firm and certain terms.

"By lambasting Microsoft, plaintiffs apparently hope to draw attention away from the flaws in their case," the Microsoft rebuttal said. "Time and again, plaintiffs' only support for bold pronouncements about applicable legal principles is a citation to their own proposed conclusions of law -- which themselves contain little in the way of legal authority."

The US government has argued that Microsoft violated antitrust laws and that the company in its conclusions of law filing a week ago ignored the substantive issues of the case, instead addressing "strawmen," and taking "a series of potshots," while also misstating legal standards to evade the relevant points in the dispute.

Microsoft rebuttal attempts to deconstruct the government's earlier filing with numerous examples of case law and other pointed criticisms of the way the DOJ has backed up its case. The software maker says the DOJ failed to provide specifics for its "strawmen" assertion and sought to apply out-of-context passages from decisions involving different market circumstances.

After Jackson ruled last November in his findings of fact that Microsoft is a monopoly, each side was allowed to respond with conclusions of law, which set forth how the software maker and the US government believe that antitrust law should be applied to the judge's findings of fact. Each side also was granted the opportunity to file rebuttal briefs arguing points made in the other's conclusions of law.

Microsoft consistently has defended its actions, contending that it is not a monopoly and that it has not misused its market position.

The software vendor's brief says the government's tying claim involving the integration of Microsoft's Internet Explorer Web browser and Windows operating system fails because the Windows 98 OS is a single, integrated product. Microsoft claims it is not forcing any customers to purchase a second distinct product, and the alleged tie does not foreclose a substantial amount of sales of the allegedly tied product.

The company further argued in the brief that Microsoft's license agreements with PC manufacturers do not constitute an unlawful restraint of trade, and it says the DOJ's attempted monopoly claim flies directly in the face of settled cases.

Microsoft has said all along that it has not engaged in illegal anticompetitive behavior by, for example, forcing other vendors to sign exclusionary deals that cut rival companies, particularly Netscape Communications (now part of America Online), out of the Internet software market.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.
Show Comments

Cool Tech

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?