AMD Athlon 64 FX
Like Intel's Extreme CPUs, AMD's FX range is aimed at the high-end PC market. Buy an FX-based CPU only if you want the absolute fastest Athlon-based performance that you can get for a gaming PC or an entry-level workstation. Wait for the Athlon 64 FX-70, FX-72 of FX-74 models if you want to buy or build a PC based on AMD's 4x4 platform for quad-core computing.
Price$ 1,050.00 (AUD)
In the high-end PC segment, the FX range of dual-core CPUs is AMD's flagship. It uses the same K8 microarchitecture as the Athlon 64 X2 CPUs, but is comprised of CPUs with higher clock frequencies than those present in the regular Athlon 64 X2 range, and 1MB of cache per CPU core is the norm.
For the AM2 platform, only the Athlon 64 FX-62 is currently available. It's built using 90 nanometre technology and can consume up to 125W of power when it's working at its full capacity. Its frequency of 2.8GHz is the fastest that we have tested from AMD and this was also reflected in our tests, where the FX-62 beat the other Athlons resoundingly.
The FX range has recently been expanded with the addition of the FX-70, FX-72 and FX-74 models. These are clocked at 2.6GHz, 2.8GHz and 3GHz, respectively, and all come with 1MB of cache per CPU core. However, none will fit into an AM2-based motherboard. Instead, these CPUs are in Socket F format, which is incompatible with AM2.
Socket F is the format used for AMD's late model Opteron CPUs, which are aimed at high-end workstation and server machines, and which can be used in pairs to enable quad-core computing. This format will be the basis for AMD's 4x4 platform, which will be aimed at enthusiasts and gamers. The 4x4 platform will have two Socket F sockets, which will allow two FX-based CPUs to be installed. Each CPU will have its own set of DDR2 memory slots. This dual-socket quad-core configuration will be more elaborate than Intel's current single-socket QX6700 solution, and it remains to be seen how its performance will stack up against its cost.
As for the FX-62, against the Core 2 Extreme CPUs, which compete in the same market segment, the FX-62 was solid, but did not come up trumps in many of our tests. The Core 2 Duo E6400 beat it the FX-62 in all but three tests, while the Core 2 Duo 6700 beat the FX-62 in all but one of our tests (the FX-62 completed the Microsoft Office Xp test a little quicker). Within the Athlon family of CPUs, the FX-62 does offer around eight percent better performance than the Athlon 64 X2 5200+, according to our Sorenson Squeeze high definition video encoding test, our Cucusoft iPod video conversion test and our Cdex MP3 encoding test, but it costs almost double the price.
The financial outlay doesn't make the FX-62 an attractive proposition for a current AM2-based PC, unless the slight boost in performance is really important to you.
Athlon 64 FX-62 Price: $1050
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo R11s review: The iClone you know and love, but not quite the one you deserve
- 2 Blackberry KEYone Black Edition review: What the original KEYone should have been
- 3 Samsung Gear IconX 2018 review: The path of least resistance makes for an easy upgrade
- 4 TCL X2 review: QLED escapes the premium market
- 5 Xbox One X review: Brave new world
Latest News Articles
- Logitech try to reinvent the keyboard experience with Logitech CRAFT
- First AMD Ryzen Desktop APUs Featuring World’s Most Powerful Graphics on a Desktop Processor
- MSI AM4 Motherboards are now ready for new AMD 2nd Generation Ryzen Desktop Processors
- Intel Xeon D-2100 set to enable new capabilities for cloud, network and service providers
- CES 2018: Everything Announced By MadCatz
PCW Evaluation Team
The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.
Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.
The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.
The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.
- Sony a7R Mk III review: The strongest case yet for ditching your DSLR
- Oppo A73 review: The budget smartphone that sets the bar for 2018
- Oppo R11s: Full, in-depth review
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
Product Launch Showcase
- FTIP Communications EngineerOther
- FTDevOps EngineerOther
- FTSenior Healthcare Pre-Sales Exec. / Clinical Advisor - Perm - North Ryde areaNSW
- CCTririga DeveloperVIC
- FTSystems AdministratorOther
- FTPaid Search StrategistOther
- FTJava Developer - Foreign ExchangeOther
- FTSenior Checkpoint Security EngineerOther
- FTBusiness Analyst - RetailOther
- FTTest Manager - "ieMR"/ "Cerner Millennium Product Suite"Other
- FTPMO ManagerNSW
- TPSAP Project ManagerQLD
- CCInfoSphere SpecialistQLD
- CCChange AnalystNSW
- FTTest Analyst - RiskOther
- FTInfrastructure Delivery ManagerOther
- CCSoftware Engineer /.NET Developer - Role based in PerthVIC
- FTData AnalystOther
- TPTechnical Support OfficerVIC
- CCFront-End DeveloperNSW
- CCNetwork Test EngineerVIC
- FTData AnalystOther
- FTData AnalystVIC
- FTCloud Platform ArchitectOther