AMD Opteron 2346 (Barcelona)
- Barcelona has all four cores located on the same die; 2MB, shared cache for all four cores, should work in existing systems
- Limited performance tests so far suggest that Barcelona may not retain the speed crown for AMD
Users already using an AMD platform may want to consider an upgrade to Barcelona, but it remains to be seen if AMD will win over any new users.
Price$ 470.00 (AUD)
The 'Barcelona' core is AMD's first foray into the quad-core CPU market, a market which Intel has had to itself since its introduction of the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 in late 2006. Barcelona is the core upon which AMD's Opteron and Phenom chips will be based, and it's manufactured using the smaller 65 nanometre fabrication process compared to its previous generation of CPUs (which were 90 nanometres).
Unlike Intel's quad-core CPUs, which are comprised of two dual-core chips in the same physical package, but on two different dies, AMD's Barcelona contains four discreet cores on the same die, which means that all cores can communicate with each other and each one has a direct link to system memory. Each core also has 512KB of Level 2 cache, but all four cores can share a 2MB Level 3 cache. Intel's quad-core CPUs don't have a shared cache (each dual-core portion has access to 4MB Level 2 cache), and unlike the Barcelona core, Intel's current quad-core CPUs aren't directly connected, which means that they rely on the front side bus in order to communicate with each other. AMD's design, in theory, should lead to a more efficient quad-core CPU, but, based on what we've seen, it's too early to tell yet whether Phenom will be able to surpass, or even match, the performance of Intel's Core 2 Duo.
AMD's Barcelona core has debuted in its Opteron line of CPUs, which are aimed at the high-end workstation and server markets, and the Phenom will follow for consumer-based PCs. The Opteron CPUs are physically different to the Phenom CPUs -- Opteron uses the Socket F (1207-pin) socket type, while Phenom uses the AM2 and AM2+ socket designs, whereas Phenom FX CPUs which are designed for the Quad FX platform also use Socket F. Phenom CPUs will be able to use low-latency DDR2 memory.
Despite all our efforts, we couldn't get our hands on a Phenom CPU, but we did test a two-socket server, based on two quad-core Opteron 2346 CPUs, running at a sluggish 1.8GHz (the speed of each core) and using 16GB of registered DDR2 RAM. The server ran a very early BIOS version, so there is still some way to go before the Barcelona platform is optimised, but we didn't have any problems getting the server up and running. We installed the AMD64-optimised version of Debian (using a GUI) on the server and ran tests using Blender.
The rendering time scaled well as the number of concurrent threads increased. Using only one thread, the 1.8GHz Opteron completed the workload in 2min 40sec, while eight threads, using 100 per cent of both CPUs, completed the same task in just 24sec -- an overall improvement of around 85 per cent over its single-thread performance.
While we didn't have time to conduct direct comparisons between servers with similar configurations, and against Intel-based servers, the www.eofw.org/bench site (which contains the benchmark that we used) has a list of results that can be used as a reference point when judging the CPU's performance. However, even the reference points should be taken with a grain of salt.
For example, the Barcelona's single-thread performance of 2min 40sec is an identical time to an Athlon 64 3000+ (1.8GHz) machine running a 64-bit version of Ubuntu. With two threads, the server took 1min 24sec to complete, which is identical to an AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ machine (2GHz) running a 64-bit version of Ubuntu. Using four threads, the server completed the workload in 44sec -- an improvement of around 72 per cent over its single-thread performance -- but this is slower than an AMD Opteron 2210 (1.8GHz) machine running a 64-bit version of Fedora Linux.
More than performance, however, Barcelona has been designed to be power efficient. It incorporates technology that can switch off different portions of the CPU and memory controller when they're not needed, and each of the four cores can operate on a different voltage, depending on the load. The CPUs are designed to be able to slot into current platforms, so AMD says they offer a seamless upgrade, but BIOS upgrades may be required in most cases. This review unit arrived just as we were going to press. Stay on the PC World Web site for all the latest test updates as we continue benchmarking and updating information on AMD's new CPUs.
Join the newsletter!
Bang and Olufsen BeoVision 14
cloudandco Smart Cane
Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44
WD MY PASSPORT™ Gaming Storage
Panasonic OLED 4K Ultra HD TV - TH-77EZ1000U
Apple iPhone X
Panasonic OLED 4K Ultra HD TV - TH-55EZ950U
SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™
Nespresso Creatista Coffee Machine
Dyson Supersonic™ Hair Dryer Fuchsia/Iron
Toys for Boys
Google Daydream View VR Headset
Propel Star Wars T-65 X-Wing Drone
Leica M10 Digital Rangefinder Camera
Bose SoundLink Micro
LaCie Rugged USB-C Portable Hard Drive
Ubiquiti Network’s Front Row Camera
Lego Mindstorms EV3
Onyx Smart Walkie Talkie
Panasonic Hi-Fi - SC-UA7GS-K
WD MY CLOUD™ HOME Personal Cloud Storage
Nest Protect Smart Smoke Alarm
Dearear Endear In-ear Wireless Earphones
Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K
iRobot Roomba 980 Vaccum Cleaning Robot
PETKIG Go Smart Dog Leash
Toffee Bags Commuter Satchel
Xbox One X
Belkin Pocket Power 10,000mAh
Amazon Echo Bluetooth Speaker
Ikea NORDMÄRKE Wireless Charging Pad
Lexon Flip Alarm Clock
3SIXT 3-in-1 Smartphone Lens Kit
Raspberry Pi Starter Kit
Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse
Logitech Doodle Collection Wireless Mouse
Panasonic Portable Splashproof Fun - RF-D20U
Tile Pro Bluetooth Tracker
Urbanworx Full HD Action Camera
Kogan Bluetooth Soundbar
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Huawei Mate 10 Pro Review: A solid winter flagship that cribs from the best
- 2 Google Pixel 2 review: not quite 'pixel perfect' but damn close
- 3 Huawei Nova 2i review: Flagship features get smuggled into the mid-tier
- 4 Moto X4 review: This is what a world without MotoMods looks like
- 5 Giabyte Aorus X9 Gaming Laptop review: Full, in-depth review
Latest News Articles
- The Razer BlackWidow Ultimate Will Now Resist the Elements
- Logitech Unveils MX ERGO, their first trackball in nearly a decade
- MSI's new Ryzen-ready motherboard coming to Oz
- Seagate Expands Portfolio with 12TB Drives for NAS and Desktop Computing
- Intel's 8th Gen Desktop Processors Go On Sale Today
PCW Evaluation Team
It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.
Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.
The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.
The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.
The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic
I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.
- Huawei Mate 10 Pro review
- The Best Australian Black Friday Tech Deals That Aren't On Amazon
- Wolfenstein The New Colossus Review
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
Product Launch Showcase
- FTICT Cloud Transformation Program Coordinator - SAPOther
- TPAndroid Engineer - Contract (6 months)NSW
- FTAutomation Test Analyst - Mobile AutomationOther
- FTBusiness AnalystNSW
- FTBusiness AnalystACT
- FTSharepoint DeveloperOther
- FTData AnalystOther
- FTPL/SQL DeveloperOther
- FTSupply Master Data AnalystOther
- FTFull Stack .Net DeveloperQLD
- FTAutomation Test AnalystOther
- FTSystem Specialist - Operational Technology SystemsOther
- FTSQL DeveloperACT
- FTPayments Business AnalystVIC
- TPSenior Business AnalystACT
- FTRecords AnalystOther
- CCCRM DeveloperVIC
- CCSenior Business AnalystNSW
- FTSenior Systems Engineer (WINTEL)ACT
- FTChange Analyst -Contract - $650 per dayOther
- FTPrinciple Project Manager- HRISOther
- FTTest Analyst, TOSCAOther
- FTBusiness AnalystNSW
- FTNetwork Support EngineerSA
- TPBusiness Improvement ManagerNSW