AMD Phenom X3 8750
Tri-core CPU isn't going to win over any Intel users
- Three cores, AM2+, 2MB L3 cache, integrated memory controller
- Not going to win over any Intel users
It's not going to get AMD any new users, but existing AMD platform users might benefit from the extra upgrade option. On its own, the tri-core Phenom X3 8750 is a fast CPU, but when its street price is compared against Intel's Core 2 Quad 6600 CPU, it doesn't look good at all.
Price$ 250.00 (AUD)
Tri-core CPUs have emerged as a differentiating product for AMD — Intel can't build CPUs with three individual cores yet. However, the company will have to re-think its pricing strategy if it wants to attract new PC builders and users looking to upgrade their existing systems.
At the time of writing, street pricing for the Phenom X3 8750 averaged $250, which was approximately $100 less than the equivalent-frequency Phenom X4 9750 quad-core CPU; and it was not at all competitive against Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 quad-core CPU, which could be found for only about $30 more at $280. This means that the X3 is unlikely to gain AMD any new users, but existing AMD platform users might find it a decent upgrade if they don't have the extra $100 needed to for an X4 chip.
However, it's worth noting that it's not guaranteed to work on all motherboards, so users should make sure they check their motherboard vendor's Web site for support. While the CPU itself is based on the AM2+ CPU socket, most motherboards with an older AM2 socket should still be able to run it but won't be able to harness the CPU's faster 3.6GHz HyperTransport speed, and instead revert to 2GHz.
The X3 8750 is comprised of three individual CPU cores, each running at 2.4GHz and each with its own 512KB L2 cache. A 2MB L3 cache is shared between all the cores; the L2 cache acts like a buffer between the cores and the L3 cache so that they don't all try to query it at the same time. It has an integrated DDR2 memory controller, too, with support for module speeds up to 1066MHz, and it also has a HyperTransport 3.0 interface, which can provide up to 16GBps bandwidth between the CPU and motherboard chipset.
In fact, it's identical to the Phenom X4 9600 in its architecture — the only thing that's different is that it has one less core and a slightly higher frequency (2.4GHz as opposed to 2.3GHz). Even the X4's and X3's thermal characteristics are identical — 95W — as the Phenom X3 is also built using AMD's 65nm (nanometre) manufacturing process.
To give you an idea of how much power the Phenom X3 will consume in a regular PC, we measured its electricity draw from the power outlet. Using a Seasonic 900W power supply, a Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6 motherboard, 2GB of Corsair DDR2 800MHz RAM, a 750GB Seagate Barracuda ES hard drive, an ATI Radeon HD 2600Pro graphics card and an ASUS Serial ATA-based DVD burner, the system consumed about 150W when idle, and 190W when under a maximum 3-D rendering load. On the same system, the Phenom X4 9600 consumed 197W when under a maximum load.
You could also use AMD's Power Monitor software (you can download it from AMD's Web site) to consume less power by using a low-power or balanced profile. In a balanced profile, the idle speed of the CPU is cut to 1.2GHz, and it will only run at 2.4GHz when the CPU's load increases. It works very well.
In our performance tests, the X3 8750 scored 93 in WorldBench 6, which is better than the X4 9600's score of 90. This is due to the X3's slightly faster frequency. In the iTunes test, where we convert 53min worth of WAV files to 192Kbps MP3s, the X3 was faster than the X4 by one second (1min 23sec compared to 1min 24sec). So you can see that if straight-line speed is required, and cores don't matter, the X3 is actually quite fast. But its three cores also keep it competitive when it comes to running multithreaded software and, of course, multitasking.
In the 3-D rendering test, using Blender, which is a multithreaded application, the X3 was able to render three threads simultaneously and complete the job in 59sec. The X4, with its extra core, completed the same job in 48sec using four threads. Incidentally, when we ran four threads on the X3, it completed the rendering task in 57sec.
So there's no question the extra core will come in handy if you're currently a dual-core AMD user with a bent for 3-D rendering and video editing and can't afford to buy a quad-core Phenom, but for Intel users, this isn't a sweet enough CPU to warrant changing platforms.
Join the newsletter!
Panasonic OLED 4K Ultra HD TV - TH-55EZ950U
Nespresso Creatista Coffee Machine
Apple iPhone X
Bang and Olufsen BeoVision 14
SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™
Panasonic OLED 4K Ultra HD TV - TH-77EZ1000U
WD MY PASSPORT™ X Gaming Storage
WD MY PASSPORT™ Gaming Storage
Dyson Supersonic™ Hair Dryer Fuchsia/Iron
Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44
Toys for Boys
Leica M10 Digital Rangefinder Camera
LaCie Rugged USB-C Portable Hard Drive
Onyx Smart Walkie Talkie
UBTech First Order Stormtrooper Robot
Bose SoundLink Micro
Ubiquiti Network’s Front Row Camera
Propel Star Wars T-65 X-Wing Drone
Lego Mindstorms EV3
Google Daydream View VR Headset
Xbox One X
iRobot Roomba 980 Vaccum Cleaning Robot
Panasonic Hi-Fi - SC-UA7GS-K
Nest Protect Smart Smoke Alarm
PETKIG Go Smart Dog Leash
Toffee Bags Commuter Satchel
Belkin Pocket Power 10,000mAh
Amazon Echo Bluetooth Speaker
Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K
Dearear Endear In-ear Wireless Earphones
WD MY CLOUD™ HOME Personal Cloud Storage
Kogan Bluetooth Soundbar
Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse
Urbanworx Full HD Action Camera
Lexon Flip Alarm Clock
Panasonic Portable Splashproof Fun - RF-D20U
Raspberry Pi Starter Kit
Logitech Doodle Collection Wireless Mouse
Ikea NORDMÄRKE Wireless Charging Pad
3SIXT 3-in-1 Smartphone Lens Kit
Fallout Geeki Tikis
Tile Pro Bluetooth Tracker
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Fitbit Ionic review: Impressive but not quite iconic
- 2 Acer Spin 5 review: Value for money but conditions apply
- 3 Huawei Mate 10 Pro Review: A solid winter flagship that cribs from the best
- 4 Sony LF-S50G review: Google Assistant and then some
- 5 Google Pixel 2 review: not quite 'pixel perfect' but damn close
Latest News Articles
- CES 2018: Everything Announced By MadCatz
- CES 2018: Crucial launches next generation MX500 SSD
- CES 2018: Intel announces new 8th-Gen Vega M-integrated processors
- CES 2018: Intel Reveals VR-Ready ‘Hades Canyon’ NUC
- BenQ unveils a pair of new ergonomic eSports mice
PCW Evaluation Team
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.
Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.
The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.
The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.
The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic
- CES 2018: Belkin go big on wearables accessories
- Amazon Alexa and Echo set for Febuary launch
- OPPO Load Up A73 Smartphone With Flagship Features
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
Product Launch Showcase
- FTExecutive Assistant (APS4)ACT
- TPSenior Business Analyst - Health - Data Linkage SystemQLD
- TPBusiness Analyst - Health - 12+ month contractQLD
- FTProgram ManagerSA
- CCSenior Front-End DeveloperQLD
- CCProgram Manager l O365, Windows 10, VMWare WorkspaceNSW
- TPBusiness Analyst - Data & Information ModellingQLD
- FTJava DeveloperWA
- FTSenior Java Developer - April startACT
- CCMid-level Architect/Technical Lead ( Java/J2EE) - Brisbane LocationVIC
- CCData ArchitectWA
- FTNetwork Engineering Team Lead/Network ManagerACT
- FTEngineer Control Systems SpecialistSA
- FTSalesforce Project ManagerOther
- CCTableau DeveloperQLD
- FTSenior .NET Developer - Back EndOther
- FTIntegration SpecialistNSW
- CCHFC Support EngineerNSW
- FTMid Level UX DesignerOther
- FTJAVA DevelopersACT
- FTGlobal Product ManagerOther
- FTUNIX Systems AdministratorOther
- FTNetwork ArchitectVIC
- FTSenior Salesforce DeveloperNSW
- FTClient Delivery DirectorACT