AMD Phenom X4 9600
- Four individual CPU cores, integrated memory controller, power management for each CPU core and the memory controller, runs on any AM2 and AM2+ motherboards
- Slower performance than Intel's competing Core 2-based chips
Those of you who already own an AM2-based AMD motherboard can give your PCs some added punch by upgrading to a Phenom 9600 quad-core chip. Sure, it's not as fast as an Intel Core 2-based CPU, but it's still a very decent product, which also has plenty of features that aim to reduce power consumption during idle times.
Price$ 380.00 (AUD)
Let's get this out of the way first: AMD's Phenom micro-architecture isn't going to produce results as fast as Intel's Core 2 micro-architecture, especially not against Intel's 45nm-based chips, but it sure as heck is competitive against Intel's 65nm-based chips. It offers a decent performance improvement over the previous generation of AMD Athlon 64 X2 chips and, of course, in the case of the Phenom 9600, it has four cores, which is great for multitasking.
There are some distinct technological differences between AMD's quad-core Phenom and Intel's Core 2 Quad, which aren't reflected in our benchmark results, but considering that AMD's Phenom is still a generation behind Intel's Core 2 as far as the size of its transistors are concerned, it's still a decent chip and well worth considering.
The Phenom 9600 runs at 2.3GHz and it's AMD's first quad-core CPU for the desktop, using transistors that are 65nm in length. It has four independent CPU cores all on the same die. This is unlike Intel's Core 2 Quad 6600 CPU (codenamed Kentsfield), which, at 2.4GHz is currently the closest match to the Phenom 9600 in terms of clock speed, and is instead comprised of two dual-core CPU dies in the same physical package.
Each Phenom core has access to a common area of level 3 cache that is 2MB in size, and each core also has access to its own 512KB level 2 cache. The CPU has an integrated memory controller; it'll only accept DDR2 memory, but can run it at speeds up to 1066MHz as it has an independent memory clock. It connects to the system chipset via a 3.6GHz (full duplex) HyperTransport link, but there is a caveat: if a motherboard with an AM2 socket is used, rather than one using an AM2+ socket, then it will only connect at 2GHz (full duplex). Perhaps the most intriguing features of Phenom are the ones concerning power consumption.
AMD has implemented dynamic power management technology that works independently of a motherboard's BIOS. It can run each of the four cores of the CPU at different speeds; it'll slow down any cores at any time depending on the load, which leads to greater power efficiency.
Because the CPU cores and the memory controller run off different power planes, the memory can also be effectively managed to consume less power when it's not in use, but this also requires an AM2+ socket. In fact, when used with an AM2+ motherboard and a 7-series AMD chipset, the memory controller can be flushed of its data and shut down. This feature is called Energy Cache and it's actually part of the Northbridge chipset of the motherboard. The flushed data is sent to the Energy Cache in a bid to conserve more power.
As for performance, we tested the 9600 in a Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6 motherboard with 2GB of DDR2 RAM, a 750GB Seagate hard drive and an ATI Radeon HD 3870-based graphics card. It produced solid results in our tests, and it's competitive against Intel's slightly faster Core 2 Quad 6600. In WorldBench 6 it scored 90, while in iTunes, which can take advantage of multiple CPU cores, it encoded 53min worth of WAV files to 192Kbps MP3 files in 1min 24sec. In Cdex, which uses one CPU core, it took 1min 54sec. These results are about 30sec slower than what an Intel Core 2 Quad 6600 can accomplish. Likewise, in WorldBench 6, Intel's Core 2 Quad 6600 managed 105, which represents a performance advantage of about 15 per cent in typical office, photo editing, and compression applications. In Blender, which is a 3-D rendering application, the Phenom processed four threads simultaneously in 48sec, which is only eight seconds slower than what a comparably configured Core 2 Quad 6600-based PC achieved.
Indeed, the performance results of the 9600 aren't spectacular, but they're still in the same arena as a similarly-clocked Intel Core 2 CPU. The good news is that going from an AMD dual-core to an AMD quad-core CPU should be a seamless transition for most users. The 9600 won't require a special chipset to run; it'll run on any motherboards that have AM2 and AM2+ CPU sockets, but might require a BIOS update in some cases. Check on your motherboard manufacturer's Web site to make sure an update is available for your board before splurging on the new CPU.
For enthusiasts, the 9600 can be overclocked, but only through front side bus manipulation as it has a locked clock multiplier (it can't go any higher). We ran it at 2.5GHz without any reliability problems, and it improved its score in WorldBench 6 by five points (from 90 to 95). It consumes about 95W of electricity at its maximum processing load, and it ships with a relatively small heat sink, which, when plugged into a motherboard with automatic fan control, is almost silent. It appears to be a great choice for users who want to build a powerful, but quiet-running quad-core media centre PC.
Join the newsletter!
WD MY PASSPORT™ X Gaming Storage
Dyson Supersonic™ Hair Dryer Fuchsia/Iron
Panasonic OLED 4K Ultra HD TV - TH-55EZ950U
Nespresso Creatista Coffee Machine
SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™
Panasonic OLED 4K Ultra HD TV - TH-77EZ1000U
Bang and Olufsen BeoVision 14
Apple iPhone X
cloudandco Smart Cane
Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44
Toys for Boys
Propel Star Wars T-65 X-Wing Drone
UBTech First Order Stormtrooper Robot
Leica M10 Digital Rangefinder Camera
Onyx Smart Walkie Talkie
Ubiquiti Network’s Front Row Camera
Bose SoundLink Micro
Lego Mindstorms EV3
Google Daydream View VR Headset
LaCie Rugged USB-C Portable Hard Drive
Xbox One X
Amazon Echo Bluetooth Speaker
Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K
WD MY CLOUD™ HOME Personal Cloud Storage
Belkin Pocket Power 10,000mAh
Dearear Endear In-ear Wireless Earphones
Toffee Bags Commuter Satchel
Panasonic Hi-Fi - SC-UA7GS-K
Nest Protect Smart Smoke Alarm
PETKIG Go Smart Dog Leash
iRobot Roomba 980 Vaccum Cleaning Robot
Tile Pro Bluetooth Tracker
Kogan Bluetooth Soundbar
Raspberry Pi Starter Kit
Ikea NORDMÄRKE Wireless Charging Pad
Panasonic Portable Splashproof Fun - RF-D20U
Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse
Lexon Flip Alarm Clock
3SIXT 3-in-1 Smartphone Lens Kit
Logitech Doodle Collection Wireless Mouse
Fallout Geeki Tikis
Urbanworx Full HD Action Camera
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Huawei Mate 10 Pro Review: A solid winter flagship that cribs from the best
- 2 Google Pixel 2 review: not quite 'pixel perfect' but damn close
- 3 Google Home Mini review: a welcome addition to the smart speaker family.
- 4 Huawei Nova 2i review: Flagship features get smuggled into the mid-tier
- 5 Moto X4 review: This is what a world without MotoMods looks like
Latest News Articles
- BenQ unveils a pair of new ergonomic eSports mice
- Crucial Launches Highest Density 128GB DDR4 LRDIMM Server Memory
- The Razer BlackWidow Ultimate Will Now Resist the Elements
- Logitech Unveils MX ERGO, their first trackball in nearly a decade
- MSI's new Ryzen-ready motherboard coming to Oz
PCW Evaluation Team
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.
Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.
The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.
The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.
The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic
- PC World 2017 Editors' Choice Awards Nomineees Announced
- LG V30+ review: The videographer's smartphone arrives
- Fitbit Ionic review: Impressive but not quite iconic
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
Product Launch Showcase
- FTData warehouse SpecialistOther
- FTProject ManagerNSW
- FTServiceNow Solution SpecialistOther
- FTTechnical Business Analyst (Rules/ Real time analysis)VIC
- CCIseries Analyst ProgrammerNSW
- FTBusiness AnalystNSW
- FTSenior Business Analyst - Commercial LeadOther
- FTManual Tester - Accounting & FinanceOther
- CCContracts OfficerNSW
- FTForm Analyst/DeveloperOther
- CCChange specialist OR Junior Change managerNSW
- FTLinux / Unix EngineerOther
- TPResource ManagerNSW
- CCProject Officer (Network Deployment Pgm) - 6 mth contract - Nth SydneyNSW
- CCWeb Applications Project ManagerVIC
- FTInfra Deployment Lead/- Windows 10 SOE rollout projectOther
- FTDynamics CRM ArchitectOther
- FTTechnical Quality Analyst (Payments, data, application integration)VIC
- FTApplication Support AnalystOther
- FTGun Java Developers wantedVIC
- CCSenior Development DBA - OracleNSW
- CCNetwork Engineer (Voice)SA
- TPDevSecOps SpecialistACT
- TPBusiness AnalystQLD
- CCData ArchitectACT