If you own an action camera, it’s probably a GoPro. But if you are planning on sharing any footage of your latest outdoor adventure with friends and colleagues, you will need more than just hardware. You will need software.
Apacer A7 Turbo (A7202) 64GB solid-state drive
A good value SSD with fast read speeds
- 128MB cache, fast read speeds, frugal power consumption, inexpensive
- Write and simultaneous speeds are poor compared to other solid-state drives
Apacer's affordable 64GB solid-state drive isn't the fastest on the market, but it can match the big boys when it comes to reading data. Frugal power consumption and good read speeds mean this SSD is better suited for overnight backups or as a secondary drive than for tasks involving disk-intensive operations or lots of simultaneous reading and writing of data.
Price$ 309.00 (AUD)
Apacer's A7 Turbo is a reasonably priced 64GB solid-state drive. It has a Serial ATA II interface and a 2.5in form factor, so it's a good value option for a notebook. It can also be used in a desktop PC if you have an appropriate mounting kit.
With a retail price of $309 and a formatted capacity of 59.5GB, the A7 Turbo has a cost per formatted gigabyte of $5.19. That's over $2 cheaper per GB than Kingston's 64GB SSDNow V+, and $1.49 less than Solidata's 32GB K6-32 SSD ($6.68). This makes the A7 Turbo one of the cheapest solid-state drives that we have reviewed to date.
The A7 Turbo uses multi-level cell (MLC) technology instead of single-level cell (SLC) technology, so it isn’t built for constant input/output operations. You won't want to use it in a server environment, but it can be used in laptops and desktop PCs for less intensive tasks. It has 128MB of drive cache; this provides a significant performance advantage when working with large files compared to the 32MB or 64MB of cache in traditional (spinning) hard drives.
Our favourite part of the drive's design is the aluminium backing, which should provide some protection from minor knocks and bumps should you choose to use the drive externally.
In our tests, the A7 Turbo recorded an average access time of around 0.2 milliseconds, which allows for snappy file browsing and quick load times. We tested the drive's performance by transferring files between it and a 300GB Western Digital Velociraptor 3.5in hard drive. We conducted a large file transfer test using 20GB worth of 3-4GB files, as well as a small file transfer test using 3GB worth of 1MB files.
|Large File (20GB) Transfer Test Results|
|Apacer A7 Turbo SSD||$309||64GB||MLC||77.9||64.7||68.3|
|Kingston SSDNow V+ SSD||$445||64GB||MLC||76.6||77.29||75.2|
|Intel X25-M SSD||N/A||80GB||MLC||76.1||74||87.8|
|Kingston SSDNow M Series||$855||80GB||MLC||73.09||71.04||52.49|
|Solidata K6-32 SSD||$199||32GB||MLC||35.9||71.1||24.8|
|Solidata K5-32 SSD||$359||32GB||SLC||76.9||42.4||37.1|
|Seagate Momentus 7200.4 HDD||$217||500GB||Hard drive||85.99||77.2||25.63|
|Small File (3GB) Transfer Test Results|
|Apacer A7 Turbo SSD||$309||64GB||MLC||50||36.1||37.5|
|Kingston SSDNow V+ SSD||$445||64GB||MLC||49.2||50||56.6|
|Intel X25-M SSD||N/A||80GB||MLC||49.2||49.2||66.7|
|Solidata K6-32 SSD||$199||32GB||MLC||46.9||38.9||25.4|
|Solidata K5-32 SSD||$359||32GB||SLC||50.6||34.1||26.8|
As can be seen from the test results, the A7 Turbo SSD is certainly able to read data quickly, producing speeds comparable to much more expensive solid-state drives like the Kingston SSDNow V+ and Intel X-25M. However, in both the 20GB and 3GB file transfer tests, the A7 Turbo performed write and simultaneous read/write tasks much slower than these drives. While this SSD is a capable performer, there are much better (albeit more expensive) alternatives if you need to perform write and simultaneous read/write tasks with large files. This will certainly be noticeable in a system drive or if it's being used as a shared network drive.
The Apacer A7 Turbo 64GB solid-state drive is quite power-efficient. During file transfer testing, the drive consumed as little as 0.24 Watts when idle (Kingston's SSDNow V+ 64GB SSD consumed 0.22W), and a maximum of 1.46W when performing a simultaneous read/write test. Power consumption averaged 0.92W when writing data and 0.54W during read tasks. Overall power consumption is slightly less than the MLC-based Kingston drive, and significantly less than both the K5 and K6 from Solidata.
Since most users are likely to read data from a drive more frequently than writing or performing multiple tasks, the A7 Turbo's slightly slower performance in these areas shouldn’t necessarily dissuade you from purchasing it. This drive is a viable option for overnight backups or for basic data storage, though it won’t fare as well in a 2.5in NAS device.
Follow PC World Australia on Twitter: @PCWorldAu
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Huawei Mate 20 Pro review: Expensive, but probably the best phone you can buy right now
- 2 Huawei Nova 3i review: All Sell, No Soul
- 3 Oppo A5X review: A winning blend of long battery, solid performance and low-price
- 4 DJI Mavic 2 Pro review: These glorious heights
- 5 Huawei FreeBuds review: Solid as a value-add, less so standalone
Latest News Articles
- Brother pitch themselves at SMBs with new 'Inkvestment' options
- Ted’s World of Imaging opening in Sydney
- McAfee QTR sees cryptocurrency mining surge continue in second quarter
- RMIT Online introduces two new Australian University courses for blockchain skills
- Telstra announces new IoT products to help locate things that matter most
PCW Evaluation Team
It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!
The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.
Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category
- Apple iPhone XS review: Astonishment at a price
- Google Pixel 3 XL review: Ghost in the machine
- Oppo Find X: Full, in-depth review
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?