Now that the home entertainment market has moved towards streaming video services and Blu-ray content, there has never been a better time to convert DVD collections to digital.
Bose 3.2.1 GSX
- Good mids and treble
- $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, 2.1 system, Lacking bass, Will require it’s own mortgage
We cannot in good faith recommend this system to anyone. Even if the sound quality was exquisite, a similar level can be achieved at a much lower price and in full surround.
Price$ 2,999.00 (AUD)
After having had a look at the Bose 3.2.1 GSX system, we began to speculate on the price. The question being asked around the office was "How much do you guys think it should be worth?" We eventually came up with a figure of around $600 to $700; a relatively high, but not unimaginable price tag for a standard 2.1 home entertainment system, keeping in mind Bose's hefty markups. So when our colleague read the price tag and began to laugh, we knew something was up.
Whilst this system is a perfectly respectable 2.1 surround sound product, the price tag just skyrockets it right into unaffordable. If you need a name system to fit into your gold plated entertainment cabinet then maybe this will be for you, but we cannot imagine how any normal person can justify spending this much on any sort of home theatre system, let alone a mere 2.1 setup. You can get a great 5.1 system for barely more than an RRP of $1500 so this price is just too extravagant.
The system sounds quite nice, don't get us wrong. It wasn't mind blowing sound like the Sharp SD-AS1W but the sound was clear and detailed. The strengths of the speakers were most noticeable in some of our Dolby Digital surround clips, really highlighting the clarity and sweet sound of the mid and treble ranges. Unfortunately the bass was somewhat lacking. Despite sporting a massive subwoofer most of our movie tracks lacked any sort of impact; it simply wasn't visceral enough to make film watching as enjoyable as it could be. Whilst an over-prominence of bass is a problem for most music listening in movies it is far more suitable and we were ultimately left unsatisfied in that regard.
Similarly, whilst we found the surround elements of the sound to be great for a 2.1 system, they are never going to compete with the immersive sound field created by a proper surround package. In the limited area that this system covered, sound was well distributed, with a fairly three dimensional feeling to it, but the inability to throw any sound behind you really limits how effective it can be. For those who cannot utilize rear speakers, due to space constraints, then yes a 2.1 setup will probably do the job, but with the prevalence of small, wireless 5.1 setups these days, space is not as bigger limitation as it used to be.
Generally with Bose, you are paying for style. Whilst with some of their other products they really are the market leaders in terms of design, in this situation they came up a little lacking. The receiver unit is fairly plain, with a black and silver colour scheme and a clear, tinted front panel containing the DVD tray. A minimal set of buttons are present along the top of the unit. The speakers are a tiny affair, barely extending outside of our cupped hands. Bose products have been noticeably growing smaller as the years have progressed, and so no real surprises here. Overall the unit will take up a minimal amount of space in your lounge, although the sub is a fairly standard size (ie: chunky) so do factor that in if you are thinking about a purchase.
The 3.2.1 GSX supports a fairly minimal number of connections. Though it has a single component output for your television connection, that is where the high definition signals end. The remaining connectivity comes in the form of three RCA ports and an optical audio input. Hardly a stellar package considering the prevalence of HDMI and multiple component devices. For running a simple DVD player home theatre system then this will be satisfactory, but for those who also have game consoles, PVRs or media centres you'll be fresh out of luck with this system.
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo R15 Pro review: A compelling mid-tier option with lots of value and few compromises
- 2 Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 review: A budget phablet that swings above its weight
- 3 LG E8 OLED TV (2018) and SK10Y soundbar review: If you've been on the fence about OLED, now might be the time to jump it
- 4 Nokia 7 Plus review: Predictable and plus-sized
- 5 Huawei P20 Pro review: See it and believe the hype
Latest News Articles
- Airplay 2 available on Sonos
- Optoma Launches Home Theatre Series
- Federal court upholds LG verdict over misleading representations
- Voice Assistant use to grow 1000% to reach 275 million by 2023, Juniper says
- Nvidia to bring Shield TV to Australian market
PCW Evaluation Team
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.
Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category
The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
- Amazon Prime Day 2018
- Oppo R15 Pro review: A compelling mid-tier option with lots of value and few compromises
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 review: A budget phablet that swings above its weight
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?