Need to buy a gift for somebody who loves technology but you can’t afford the big ticket items?
Epson Stylus Office T1100 A3+ inkjet printer
Epson's Stylus Office T1100 is the company's cheapest A3+ inkjet printer
- Document scaling option, reasonable print speeds, good document and photo print quality
- Oversaturated colours on presentation documents, no Ethernet, rear paper tray is cumbersome
Epson's Stylus Office T1100 A3+ inkjet printer is quite bulky and it doesn't have Ethernet or an automatic duplexer. Thankfully it can scale A4 documents extremely well and the quality of photos is sufficient for occasional use.
Price$ 399.00 (AUD)
Epson's Stylus Office T1100 is the company's cheapest A3-capable inkjet printer and is targeted at small to medium offices. It doesn't offer the print quality of more expensive photo printers, but it can print quickly, easily enlarges A4 documents and is inexpensive to run.
As you would expect for a device that can accept A3+ media, the Epson Stylus Office T1100 is quite sizeable. Sadly, Epson has gone with a rear paper tray instead of the more common front paper cassette. This greatly increases the printer’s overall height — 400mm with the tray fully extended — and reduces placement options.
Unless you have a print server, network printing is also out of the question; the Epson Stylus Office T1100 only offers a USB 2.0 connection. This won’t be an issue if you only need to connect a dedicated design computer, but it is an extra hassle if you wish to print from multiple computers.
The Stylus Office T1100 A3+ inkjet printer uses Epson’s 73HN and 103 ink consumables — the same used in the Stylus Office TX510FN multifunction — making this printer extremely affordable to run. Based on Epson's page yields — 1610 A4 pages per set of five high-yield inks — the printer costs roughly 11.3c per A4 page. Real world ink usage is likely to yield fewer pages, especially when taking printer maintenance tasks into account, but it's still cheaper to run than A3-capable inkjet printers from HP and Brother.
In our tests, the Epson Stylus Office T1100 printed draft A4 monochrome documents at a rate of 17.2 pages per minute and draft A4 colour documents at 9ppm. Though slower than the HP Officejet 7000 in draft print tests, the Stylus Office T1100 didn't handle pages as roughly as the HP. In normal quality mode, documents printed at 13.2ppm (monochrome) and 4.2ppm (colour).
A3 documents took roughly double the time of their A4 counterparts; normal quality monochrome documents printed at a rate of 6.2ppm while colour documents printed at a rate of 4ppm.
Photo printing is generally slow. Our test 4x6in photo took 1min 12sec to print, while an A4 photo took 2min 53sec. We waited 4min 31sec for the same photo to print in A3, which is a far cry from the 2min it took the HP Officejet 7000 Wide Format inkjet printer to produce the same photo.
The Epson Stylus Office T1100 A3+ has a major advantage over some of its competitors: it can scale A4 documents. Unlike the Officejet 7000 Wide Format, Epson’s print driver has a scaling option that directly interfaces with the printer, unlike those options available in Microsoft Word or similar applications. The result is a much clearer and higher quality enlargement that retains all of the detail of the A4 original.
Unfortunately, it isn't all good news when it comes to print quality. Though documents are accurate, colours in graphics and text highlights appear oversaturated and inky. Photo colours are much better when using Epson-branded paper, though there is some noise, particularly in gradients. Monochrome photo quality isn't fantastic either; even when using Epson's suggested photo paper we noticed a red hue in our test black and white photo which reduces detail and darkness levels.
For the occasional photo, the Epson Stylus Office T1100 A3+ inkjet printer does the job, but its key strengths lie are printing professional documents and scaling A4 material. Inexpensive consumables are certainly a key advantage, too, though we wish Epson included an Ethernet port for networked offices.
Follow PC World Australia on Twitter: @PCWorldAu
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo A5X review: A winning blend of long battery, solid performance and low-price
- 2 Huawei FreeBuds review: Solid as a value-add, less so standalone
- 3 HP Omen 15 (2018): Full, in-depth review
- 4 HP Envy x360 13 (Ryzen): Full, in-depth review
- 5 Oppo Find X review: Damn.
Latest News Articles
- Judge paves the way for British hacker's extradition to US
- FBI faces lawsuit because it's stayed mum on iPhone 5c hack
- Early iPhone 7 reviews: You'll miss the headphone jack, but the camera and battery life are tops
- Toshiba's new SSD line features rock-bottom pricing
- Watch out: iOS 10 install is reportedly bricking some iPhones
PCW Evaluation Team
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.
Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category
The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
- Samsung Galaxy Note 9: Full, in-depth, Australian review
- Oppo Find X: Full, in-depth review
- Hands on with Huawei's Mate 20 Pro
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?