Epson Stylus Photo TX700W
Comprehensive connectivity but poor quality printing.
- Ethernet and Wi-Fi connectivity, CD/DVD printing, separate media trays, fast print speeds
- Poor print and scan quality
Though the TX700W offers a lot of functionality and connectivity, it is ultimately let down by poor quality. This multifunction performs acceptably for a simple text printer, but there are better options in the same price range.
Price$ 299.00 (AUD)
Epson's Stylus Photo TX700W does not include some of some of the business-focused functionality of the more expensive Stylus Photo TX800FW, nor does it have some of the TX800FW's standout features. Fortunately, the comprehensive connectivity remains. Unfortunately the TX700W doesn't have the quality level that we desire from a multifunction with the Stylus Photo branding.
The TX700W has an Italian design that incorporates a stylish black fascia and some interesting curves. It lacks an automatic document feeder and, more interestingly, the touch panel found on the Stylus Photo TX800FW is replaced by a 2.5in colour LCD screen and a standard button layout. The controls are placed on a hinged panel that can be tilted to suit the user by simply lifting it, though replacing it into its original position requires the user to press an Unlock button (we missed the button at first glance).
The TX700W lacks a fax function, but it offers Ethernet and Wi-Fi connectivity, as well as a media card reader supporting MemoryStick, SD, xD, CompactFlash and a PictBridge-capable USB port. The printer also offers direct CD/DVD printing with an integrated input tray, and it has a separate photo paper tray.
The TX700W has slightly inconsistent printing speeds, but it generally prints quickly. A mono text document in draft quality will print at an average of 24.2 pages per minute, with the first page out in 22 seconds. This slows to 8.7ppm when using normal quality. Graphical documents are similarly fast, at 25ppm in draft and 8.9ppm in normal quality mode. Standard 4x6in photos print in 28.6sec; A4 photos take 1min 17sec.
It may be fast, but the TX700W doesn't provide the greatest quality. Text documents are readable, but characters are much bolder than they should be and aren't as clear as text printed by the Stylus Photo TX800FW. Colours are hardest hit: they are over-saturated and have poor contrast. Colours on both graphical documents and photos are very dull. On the other hand, banding is only barely visible and the clarity is somewhat acceptable. However, we didn't expect such a drop in quality compared to the Stylus Photo TX800FW.
Scan quality is unfortunately similar in most respects. Colours are mostly dull when compared to the source image. Though this does not affect text quality in any way, photos suffer. Without an automatic document feeder, the TX700W won't be good for large scanning jobs. For small tasks it is acceptable, but look elsewhere if you're after perfect accuracy.
The TX700W's direct CD/DVD printing is also of disappointing quality. Thankfully, due to the integrated CD/DVD tray and the accompanying software, the function is easy to access and use. The multifunction provides comprehensive editing options for titles and images, while the use of an integrated tray eradicates the possibility of losing the loose palettes normally used for CD and DVD direct printing.
Join the newsletter!
Cartier Calibre de Cartier Diver Watch
Ballistix Tactical Tracer RGB 3000
Ballistix Sport AT
Bang and Olufsen Beoplay A9 Speaker
Apple iMac Pro
Samsung QLED 8K TV
Toys for Boys
Tivoli PAL BT
ESET Cyber Security Pro for Mac
ESET Internet Security
Osmo Coding Awbie Game
Little Bits DROID Inventor Kit
Nix Pro Colour Sensor
ESET Smart Security Premium
Oregon Pro WMR500 Weather Station
SmartLens - Clip on Phone Camera Lens Set of 3
TimeFlip Magnet Simple Time Tracking Device
Ikea RIGGAD work lamp with wireless charging
Ultimate Ears Wonderboom Bluetooth Speaker
Naztech Xtra Drive Mini + 256GB microSD Card
Technology is revolutionising the way we do things and that includes in the kitchen where a wealth of must-have gadgets and appliances are the making life easier for home cooks.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo R17 Pro review: Oppo's thriftiest flagship yet drives a hard bargain
- 2 Tenda Nova MW6 review: A gateway drug for mesh Wi-Fi
- 3 Huawei Mate 20 Pro review: Expensive, but probably the best phone you can buy right now
- 4 Apple iPhone XS review: Astonishment at a price
- 5 Huawei Nova 3i review: All Sell, No Soul
Latest News Articles
- Brother pitch themselves at SMBs with new 'Inkvestment' options
- Canon unveils its latest range of Pixma Inkjet printers and CanoScan scanner series
- Epson Launches First Double-Sided A3+ 4-In-1 Inkjet EcoTank Printer
- Epson launches new Expression Premium Photo Range
- Epson Australia Unveils New Expression Home Range of Printers
PCW Evaluation Team
I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)
It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!
The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.
- PC World 2018 Editor's Choice Awards
- Huawei Mate 20 Pro review: Full, in-depth, Australian review
- Razer Phone 2 review: One for the fans
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?