While the importance of data backup is a well-known cliché for business users, many businesses would rather stick to existing, limited, overly-convoluted and – in some cases – outdated practices than introduce more modern backup solutions to their organisation.
Hewlett-Packard Australia Pavilion DV2000
- Stylish looks, 1.3 MP Webcam.
- Screen is distorts when flexed, short battery life.
Though it's not the fastest notebook you can buy and its battery life was dissapointing, the media center functionality and the price of this unit makes it a worthy purchase.
Price$ 1,999.00 (AUD)
One of the more stylish looking notebooks we've seen yet, the HP Pavilion dv2000 is designed as a mobile entertainment centre. The Pavilion integrates media keys, an imaginative stow-away remote control and good media connectivity, like a 5-in-1 media card reader, for an all-round media centre experience. HP's media software, called QuickPlay, handles all facets of media viewing and can also play media (MP3, DVD, AVI, WMV) without having to boot to Windows.
The thin 14.1in (1280x800) screen doesn't look exceptional, especially on vertical angles and suffers from distortion when flexed. However, it does incorporate a 1.3Mp webcam in the top bezel with a built-in (though slightly ineffectual) light.
Apart from the screen the unit has a nice and sturdy build. An advanced lamination coating, traditionally used in luxury car interiors, gives this notebook a nice finish and the blue-lit media controls look stylish without being too garish. Altec Lansing speakers provide good sound though they would benefit from some bass. The keys are a comfortable size and the track-pad is easy to use, it even has a quick disable button if you wish to turn it off.
We ran World Bench 5 with a result of 76 and 3DMark 2001 SE getting a result of 5102. These scores were what we expected for a machine with a budget T2050 1.60GHz Intel dual core CPU inside, 1GB of 533MHz RAM and an Intel 945GM Express graphics chip. Our main concern was the short battery life. Running MobileMark 2002's most basic usage test (reader test) it only lasted for 109mins, which will be considerably shorter if pushed by a DVD or heavy multitasking.
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo A5X review: A winning blend of long battery, solid performance and low-price
- 2 Huawei FreeBuds review: Solid as a value-add, less so standalone
- 3 HP Omen 15 (2018): Full, in-depth review
- 4 HP Envy x360 13 (Ryzen): Full, in-depth review
- 5 Oppo Find X review: Damn.
Latest News Articles
- Samsung unveil Galaxy Book 2
- Alienware angle towards portability with Alienware m15
- Razer announces new headset, keyboard and mouse
- IFA 2018: MSI expand Prestige range with new P65 Creator
- IFA 2018: ASUS launch first TUF gaming laptops
PCW Evaluation Team
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.
Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category
The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
- Samsung Galaxy Note 9: Full, in-depth, Australian review
- Oppo Find X: Full, in-depth review
- Hands on with Huawei's Mate 20 Pro
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?