Gaming laptops are traditionally full of compromises.
Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
The perfect Android phone. Almost
- Great battery
- Very fast
- Good value
- Potentially-amazing camera
- Potentially-disappointing camera
It succeeds in the three key areas required of smart phones: battery, performance and camera. As such it's great value at $999. However, the camera can struggle in basic low-light conditions. We hope this will get fixed down the line.
Price$ 999.00 (AUD)
The Huawei Mate 9 Camera review
Last year we raved about Huawei’s P9 phone. This was nicknamed the ‘Leica phone’ because the outstanding dual-camera system was created in conjunction with the legendary camera brand and the results it produced pulled the rug from every cameraphone that came before it. The Mate 9 uses the second generation of the Leica system that is on the P9. As such it promised to be even better. This got our attention.
Once again there are two cameras with two different sensors. There’s a 20-megapixel monochrome sensor which doesn’t just excel at capturing black-and-white images but records more lighting information than regular colour sensors. This works in conjunction with the standard 12-megapixel colour camera in a few ways.
Firstly, the additional image and lighting information captures more colour and lighting detail than rivals which results in more-vibrant images. The dual lenses also allow for more-diverse focusing. Regular cameraphones have a wide-angle lens set at a default to let in as much light as possible at all times. With these two sensors, however, more focusing and aperture-related effects can be achieved making pictures come to life more than elsewhere.
The wide-aperture Bokeh effect, which makes subjects jump out from the image thanks to a shallow depth of field, speak for themselves (and are much better than we’ve seen with the iPhone 7 Plus’ dual camera system):-
With the P9, the forced blur of the effect could go wrong on some occasions. It’s improved with the Mate 9.
By pressing the aperture icon all information in the image can be captured so that you can refocus it later. This feature never ceases to surprise and delight with the effects it achieves and it also rescues many potentially-great shots that at first seemed to have been captured chronically out of focus.
There are many manual settings to play with and they’re easily accessible. Simply adjusting metering is simple – you tap where you want to focus and then slide your finger up and down next to that point. Adjusting the aperture involves a slider (which is now) at the side of the screen but if you’re using this feature it’s easier to do it after you’ve taken the shot than before.
The dual lens system also means that you can get an enhanced 2x zoom happening without resorting to simply enlarging the digital pixels as with other cameras’ digital zoom functions. It’s not quite an optical zoom, but it’s impressively sharp.
But we can’t say the camera is an outright success. Low-light performance isn’t quite as good as the Pixel XL or Samsung Galaxy Phones or even many others. While the Mate 8’s simple camera managed to snap away accurately all day at trade shows, the Mate 9 really struggles indoors: focusing is inaccurate more often than not, low-light grain and blur are present even in modest lighting. In minimal light, unless you spend time with manual settings, the grainy, over-sharpened results are a mess.
The temptation is therefore to always use the aperture- enhanced mode so you can refocus everything later. But this may cause problems in some situations. If you take too many aperture-enhanced shots in a row the phone gets very hot indeed. If you keep on taking them it will shut down in order to cool off. While this only occurred when we were doing a full photo shoot, it was frustrating when it happened.
In general usage outdoors and in good lighting, though, it’s usually great. But it’s noticeably not as responsive, fast-focusing or accurate (or as fast to launch) as the Pixel XL. Hopefully this will improve over time: the hardware on this camera suggests it should fare better at the basics than simply excel at the complicated stuff. If we were covering another trade show we’d want to take both the Pixel (or Samsung S7) for quick snaps in mediocre-lighting AND the Mate 9 for more-considered detail. Really we should only need the Mate 9.
In terms of video. We preferred the stabilised 1080p Full HD performance to the 4K capturing which wasn’t particularly sharp and got very grainy in low light. Once again, focusing is faster and more accurate outdoors in good lighting but a bit slower and less accurate in modest light. Sound is captured impressively well. Ultimately, it's still very useable but not the best we’ve seen.
The Huawei Mate 9 is set to be one of the flagship phones of the year. We’ve already seen HTC’s and, while very pretty, it’s not as good as this. The main threat on the horizon is the Samsung Galaxy S8 which is coming in mid-April. We suspect it will be a cross between the S7 and the Pixel, which is no bad thing. But it will also, likely, cost (about $200) more and have a weaker battery. It also appears to still have the silly bezel-less curved screen Samsung seems to like although it is also likely to be waterproof.
Elsewhere there’s the Pixel XL. We love that phone and we missed the fast, low-light-thriving camera on that, but the mediocre battery gets annoying. It’s also ridiculously expensive. The main rival we’d like to is see is the Huawei Mate 9 Pro but Huawei has said it’s not sure it will be coming to Australia.
Overall, it means that despite some issues with the camera, the Mate 9 is still one of the most innovative and fastest flagship phones on the market and has the best battery life to boot. Those are the main key features most people want from any phone and at $999 that represents outstanding value.
Quite simply, this is the best phone you can buy right now. If they fix the camera issues, it will probably be the best phone for the rest of the year too.
Update: The Huawei Mate 10 is now available, read our full review here.
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Google Pixel 3a review: Less is more
- 2 Huawei P30 Pro review: A photography powerhouse that leans into and elevates its natural strengths
- 3 Samsung Galaxy S10 review: Messy decisions mar smart evolutions
- 4 Dell G7 review: Growing pains
- 5 Nokia 8.1 review: The more things change, the more they stay the same
Latest News Articles
- The BlackBerry Key2 has finally landed in Australia
- Telstra launch Australia's first 5G hotspot
- It looks like Samsung Galaxy S10 5G will be Australia's first 5G smartphone
- Telstra enter the Click Frenzy fray with new phone plan deals
- Huawei Australia respond to Android license crisis
PCW Evaluation Team
As the Maserati or BMW of laptops, it would fit perfectly in the hands of a professional needing firepower under the hood, sophistication and class on the surface, and gaming prowess (sports mode if you will) in between.
The MSI PS63 is an amazing laptop and I would definitely consider buying one in the future.
This small mobile printer is exactly what I need for invoicing and other jobs such as sending fellow tradesman details or step-by-step instructions that I can easily print off from my phone or the Web.
Microsoft Office continues to make a student’s life that little bit easier by offering reliable, easy to use, time-saving functionality, while continuing to develop new features that further enhance what is already a formidable collection of applications
I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)
It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!
- Huawei P30 Pro: Full, in-depth review
- Panasonic Lumix S1 review
- Google Pixel 3a review: Less is more
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?