Intel Core 2 Duo Extreme Processor QX9770
- Very quick, runs relatively cool
- Won't run on all chipsets
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is for demanding users who want the current fastest quad-core performance on the market.
What makes a CPU 'extreme'? For the Intel Core 2 Duo Extreme Processor QX9770 it's a 3.2GHz clock speed, a 12MB level 2 cache and a 1600MHz front side bus. Why would you need such a fast and well equipped CPU? Mainly for video rendering and other applications that will benefit from a fast clock speed and multithreading. For the average computer user, who will be browsing the Web, playing the odd game and working on office and photo applications, this CPU is overkill.
The QX9770 is very similar to the QX9775 CPU, but it's aimed at professionals and enthusiasts who want the fastest four-core solution they can find. Indeed, both the QX9770 and QX9775 are quad-core CPUs and they share the same clock, cache and front side bus statistics. Both are built using Intel's 45nm (nanometre) technology, but the QX9770 is designed to work in a single-socket motherboard. It's still based on a 775-pin socket, whereas the QX9775 is based on a 771-pin socket and is designed to run in Intel's dual-CPU-based Desktop Board D5400XS (Skulltrail) motherboard.
Technologically, the 45nm manufacturing process is the smallest process in use from Intel for its CPUs and is currently smaller than AMD's competing Phenom offerings, which are built using 65nm technology. This means that the QX9770 has room for more, smaller transistors – it packs over 800 million of them, in fact. The Q9770's core is essentially two dual-core CPUs in the same physical package and each dual-core portion of the CPU has its own 6MB level 2 cache.
To measure its performance, we used an ASUS Rampage Formula motherboard, which is based on the Intel X48 chipset, along with 2GB of 1066MHz DDR2 memory, a Seagate Barracuda ES hard drive and an ATI Radeon HD 3450 graphics card. In WorldBench 6, the CPU scored 127, which is a very competitive figure, but it was in the Blender 3D test where we found its performance to be identical to the QX9775.
Rendering a project using one thread, the QX9770 took one minute 45 seconds. Using two threads it took 55sec and four threads to 29sec. These results are identical to the QX9775, which we tested in the Skulltrail kit. It's not surprising though, as both CPUs have the same specifications. The 3.2GHz frequency is actually the fastest of the current crop of Core 2 CPUs and this speed is attributed to the faster front side bus speed of 1600MHz, which also means the CPU can interact with the memory at a faster rate than CPUs with a slower front side bus. Of course, we used DDR2 memory running at 1066MHz, but a motherboard with DDR3 memory running at a native 1600MHz speed should yield even faster results.
But if you're thinking about getting the QX9770 for your latest high-end machine, you'll have to make sure your motherboard's chipset supports it. While a motherboard with an Intel X48 chipset is sure to support it, boards based on the X38 might also be able to run it. As always, it's best to check on your motherboard manufacturer's Web site to make sure.
As for heat and power consumption, the QX9770 has a TDP (thermal design point) of 135W, but this is actually a competitive figure for a quad-core CPU, thanks to the 45nm manufacturing process. It beats AMD's fastest Phenom CPU – the 9900 – which is based on a 65nm process and approximately half as many transistors (over 400 million) for its TDP rating of 140W. Still, you'll need a decent heat sink and fan assembly to keep the QX9770 running cool, and a hefty power supply will be required, too (think over 500W, depending on the configuration of your machine).
Join the newsletter!
Modern living is all about functionality and security for everybody from the very young to the very old. With Imou anybody can enjoy smart life – the solution is at their fingertips.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Google Pixel Buds (2020) review: Course correction
- 2 Oppo Find X2 Lite review: Gilded without being gauche
- 3 Jabra Evolve2 85 review: Learning the right lessons
- 4 Oppo Find X2 Neo review: Class Act
- 5 Huawei Matebook X Pro (2020) review: The real deal
Latest News Articles
- Razer downsize their optomechanical Huntsman gaming keyboard
- Lenovo play to their strengths with ThinkVision M14T mobile monitor
- Razer refresh mecha-membrane option with new Ornata 2 keyboard
- One of HP’s best gaming monitors is dumb cheap for Click Frenzy
- You can now control your Razer-powered RGB lighting setup with Alexa
PCW Evaluation Team
Ultimately this laptop has achieved everything I would hope for in a laptop for work, while fitting that into a form factor and weight that is remarkable.
I highly recommend the Dynabook Portégé® X30L-G notebook for everyday business use, it is a benchmark setting notebook of its generation in the lightweight category.
This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.
It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.
As the Maserati or BMW of laptops, it would fit perfectly in the hands of a professional needing firepower under the hood, sophistication and class on the surface, and gaming prowess (sports mode if you will) in between.
The MSI PS63 is an amazing laptop and I would definitely consider buying one in the future.
- Why do gamers like RGB Lights?
- Huawei Matebook X Pro (2020) review: The real deal
- Oppo Find X2 Pro review: The Ultimate Alternative Flagship
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?