Intel Pentium 4 EE 840 3.2GHz
- Great performance with programs designed to recognize the dual core.
- Requires a mainboard upgrade
Don't expect dual-core to be the top performer today for games and other demanding single-threaded applications but that will change as applications are rewritten.
Price$ 2,099.00 (AUD)
Our tests show Intel's new dual-core desktop processors should deliver some real benefits when used with software designed to take advantage of the two cores, or when you're performing multiple tasks simultaneously--virus scanning while surfing the Web, for instance.
Dual-core processors incorporate two physical processors and two level 2 memory caches into one piece of silicon, functioning, in practice, like two separate processors.
The 3.2GHz Pentium Extreme Edition 840 (which carries 1MB of L2 cache per core) was Intel's first dual-core chip. In addition to dual-core, it has Intel's Hyper-Threading technology in each core, which theoretically brings you a "virtual" second processor per core. (Hyper-Threading is designed to increase a processor's efficiency, enabling it to come closer to reaching its full theoretical processing potential.)
To use an Intel dual-core chip, you need a motherboard that supports them, so you would probably have to upgrade you motherboard along with your processor. Unlike Intel's dual-core chips, the new AMD dual-core processors don't require new chipsets or motherboards, just a BIOS upgrade.
Like AMD's Athlon 64 chips and other new high-end Pentium EE chips, the dual-core CPU has 64-bit support.
We tested a preproduction reference system from Intel with engineering samples of the Pentium Extreme Edition 840 and the new 955X Express chipset; 1GB of DDR2-667 memory; and a Sapphire Radeon 850XT graphics card. The system ran Windows XP Professional.
The dual-core unit showed a slight improvement overall on PC WorldBench 5 versus the same system equipped with a 3.2GHz P4 (both with Hyper-Threading on). But the new system truly showed its mettle in certain portions of PC WorldBench 5--specifically our multitasking test and our media tests with Roxio VideoWave Movie Creator and Windows Media Encoder. Both applications are multithreaded, which means they can recognise and use the two cores as if they were two separate processors. On the multitasking test, the dual-core CPU produced its best result: it took just nine minutes and 50 seconds to open numerous Web pages while converting video and music files to Windows Media format, whereas the single-core 3.2GHz Pentium 4 took almost 12 minutes.
Interestingly, we found that the dual-core unit performed better on the multithreaded applications with Hyper-Threading turned off than with the technology enabled.
Join the newsletter!
Bitdefender’s best-in-class security solutions have been awarded Product of the Year.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo A73 review: The budget smartphone that sets the bar for 2018
- 2 Oppo R11s review: The iClone you know and love, but not quite the one you deserve
- 3 Blackberry KEYone Black Edition review: What the original KEYone should have been
- 4 Zolo Liberty+ review: The true wireless earbuds you've been waiting for
- 5 Samsung Gear IconX 2018 review: The path of least resistance makes for an easy upgrade
Latest News Articles
- Intel launches 800P Optane SSD
- Radeon Software Brings Faster, Smoother Performance to the World’s Most Popular eSports Titles, Thanks to AMD’s Project ReSX
- Logitech try to reinvent the keyboard experience with Logitech CRAFT
- First AMD Ryzen Desktop APUs Featuring World’s Most Powerful Graphics on a Desktop Processor
- MSI AM4 Motherboards are now ready for new AMD 2nd Generation Ryzen Desktop Processors
PCW Evaluation Team
The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.
Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.
The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.
The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.
- Hands On: Pitting the Apple HomePod against the Sonos One
- Everything You Can Do, I Can Do Better: Comparing The Google Home’s Assistant To Amazon Echo’s Alexa
- Samsung Galaxy S9+ review: A predictably-exellent flagship uplifted by a standout camera
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
Product Launch Showcase
- CC.NET DeveloperQLD
- CCStorage EngineerNSW
- CCCyber Security Business AnalystVIC
- FTSenior Developer - API: C# .Net Developer | FinTech | APIOther
- FTSenior Change AnalystOther
- FTMDM ArchitectOther
- FTBig Data Analyst/Business AnalystNSW
- TPMicrosoft Dynamics DeveloperQLD
- TPPrincipal SAP ABAP DeveloperQLD
- CCSenior Agile Business AnalystNSW
- FTSoftware EngineerOther
- TPScrum MasterNSW
- FTService Asset & Configuration ManagerNSW
- TPManager, IT and Digital SupportVIC
- FTOracle PL / SQL / APEX DeveloperOther
- FTSecurity Operations Specialist (SIEM)Other
- FTProject ManagerOther
- FTSenior Consultant - DevOpsOther
- FTSolution ArchitectOther
- CCProject Manager-SCADANSW
- FTSEO ExecutiveOther
- TPTechnical Business AnalystQLD
- FTTester (Dynamics AX)Other
- FTSharePoint DeveloperOther