So, what do I want out of my next laptop and what must it include?
JVC GC-FM1 HD pocket camcorder
The GC-FM1 HD shoots great bright-light video, but is hampered by its build, finicky controls and execution of marquee features
- Excellent video in optimum lighting, good 4x digital zoom and macro mode
- Poor low-light performance, cheap plastic finish, too expensive for what it offers
The JVC GC-FM1 HD pocket camcorder shoots some of the best bright-light video we've seen, but it's hampered by its plastic build, its finicky controls, and the execution of its marquee features.
Price$ 299.00 (AUD)
But pocket-camcorder championships aren't won on paper.
Like the Zi8, the GC-FM1 shoots 1080p video and offers digital image stabilisation, two positive distinguishing factors in the now-crowded HD pocket camcorder market. And just as the Zi8 does, this JVC pocket camcorder has a landscape/macro toggle, the ability to shoot still photos (8 megapixels, versus the Zi8's 5-megapixel sensor), an HDMI-out port for viewing footage on an HDTV (no HDMI cable is included, however), and an SDHC card slot for storing videos and still images.
However, the GC-FM1's feature set is much better in theory than it is in practice. Since this device has no flip-out USB connector, you have to offload clips and images to your PC via an included USB cable. It also falls short of its pint-size competitors in usability, durability, audio quality, and controls -- and that's frustrating, because JVC's first pocket camcorder shoots some of the best-quality bright-light video we've seen to date.
In head-to-head video tests with competing pocket camcorders, the JVC GC-FM1 turned in above-average footage in well-lit situations. It showed better highlight definition than the Kodak Zi8 and the Flip Video MinoHD -- two of the best pocket camcorders we've tested in terms of video quality -- and its video looked a bit sharper than clips shot with the second-generation MinoHD.
Colors looked more muted and less vibrant than in footage from the Zi8 and MinoHD, and the MinoHD seemed to capture video with smoother motion. All in all, the JVC GC-FM1 earned a video-quality score of Very Good in comparison with the pocket-camcorder competition.
The JVC GC-FM1 shoots .mov files at about 88GB per minute of footage.
Unfortunately, footage shot in low light with the JVC GC-FM1 is another story entirely. The GC-FM1 received a low-light score of Fair, clearly outmatched by the low-light footage that the second-generation Flip Video MinoHD produced.
Even if you're willing to sacrifice low-light video quality for the sake of the GC-FM1's much-better bright-light footage, this pocket camcorder has a handful of disappointing drawbacks. A big one is the audio quality: The on-board microphone picked up a lot of hiss in our test footage, making the audio tracks for clips sound as if they were being played back on a cassette deck.
I also didn't have much luck with the GC-FM1's digital image stabilisation feature. If it worked at all, it did so only with the slightest of movements; still photos taken while I slowly moved the camcorder from side to side came out blurry.
And when you use the GC-FM1 in still-photo mode, it offers no "click" noise or any visual indication that you've captured a photo. The screen simply blinks a bit, and you don't see a preview of the image you've just shot unless you dive into the playback menus and scroll down to find it.
Perhaps the main drawback is the build quality of the device itself. The JVC GC-FM1's flashy, reflective faceplate, ribbed silver edges, and colorful back panel are all made of very lightweight plastic, and the entire device feels too light and fragile to be durable. The buttons on the back are all plastic, as well, and they're too small for anything but the smallest hands to use effectively. You get a power button, a playback button, a delete button, a still/video toggle, a menu button, and a four-way navigation pad/record button that also controls the GC-FM1's 4X digital zoom.
The power button is not very responsive; I had to hold it down for a few seconds or press it more than once to turn on the device. The menu button isn't entirely useful, either: It works only when you hold down the delete button while pressing it.
On top of that, the menu options are surprisingly limited. You can adjust the time display, toggle between the PAL and NTSC formats for video-out, check your firmware version, or format your SDHC card -- and that's it. You get none of the frame-rate controls or other tweakable settings that you do on the Kodak Zi8.
On a bright note, the 4X digital zoom worked smoothly, and full-zoom footage looked notably better than what we've seen from the half-baked digital zooms on nearly all other pocket camcorders. The landscape/macro toggle on the left side of the camcorder also worked fairly well, and the macro mode worked at a slightly closer distance from the subject than did the macro mode on the Zi8.
All in all, the JVC GC-FM1 costs too much to recommend, considering its shortcomings compared with the Kodak Zi8. Its video quality in good lighting is among the best we've seen, and its highlight definition is a strong suit. However, the build quality, buttons, audio quality, and controls all detract from the device's usability, and the 1080p-shooting Zi8 allows much greater flexibility with your video.
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 ASUS FX503 review: An ROG Notebook By Any Other Name
- 2 HP Envy x360 (Ryzen 5) review: Power over portability
- 3 Oppo A73 review: The budget smartphone that sets the bar for 2018
- 4 Oppo R11s review: The iClone you know and love, but not quite the one you deserve
- 5 Blackberry KEYone Black Edition review: What the original KEYone should have been
Latest News Articles
- Netgear recall Arlo power adapters
- Canon Strengthens 2:3” Broadcast Lens Range
- Canon Introduces Cinema EOS C700 FF Camera and More
- Netgear Launches the Arlo Go LTE Wire-Free Camera on Telstra’s Mobile Network
- D-Link Wins Prestigious iF Design Award 2018
PCW Evaluation Team
Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category
The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.
Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.
The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.
- Frostpunk review: A richly conceived and vividly realised city sim
- Netgear Arlo Go review: An expensive but comprehensive home security solution
- Fitbit Versa review: New look, better price, same limits
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?