35 per cent of professionals feel frustration due to bad audio. And yet, while organisations have rushed to enable remote work policies over half (51 per cent) of organisations still only allow certain teams to order headsets or headphones.
Kodak EASYSHARE C763
- Good noise levels, crisp pictures
- A little over sharpening
A good but not outstanding compact camera, Kodak's EASYSHARE C763 will satisfy most users, but there are better purchases out there for the same asking price.
Price$ 269.00 (AUD)
The latest of their entries into the compact camera market, Kodak's EASYSHARE C763 is a solid, but not outstanding digital camera. It doesn't have much in the way of manual features, but the pictures are of reasonable quality and the slim, sturdy build should appeal to some users.
As usual, we ran our standard combination of subjective testing and Imatest analysis to determine the quality of the C763's pictures, and the results were quite good. Imatest did pick up some over sharpening in the sharpness test, giving it a score of 21.6%. This is quite a bit higher than most other models, and made itself evident in pictures with some extremely strong emphasis on certain edges. However, it isn't too bad compared to other models that have achieved similar over sharpening ratings, and shouldn't have a huge impact unless you make sizeable enlargements.
High over sharpening scores tend to impact upon the sharpness result a little, so we took the score of 1577 with a grain of salt. However, our shots were crisp and detailed for the most part, with minimal fringing and blurring. We also ran our test for chromatic aberration and the C763 received a 0.115% score, which is about what we expect from a consumer level model. The pictures captured by the C763's 7.1 megapixel sensor exhibit some minor blurring towards the edges and a little haloing in areas of high contrast, but it is no worse than expected and won't have a big impact on your shots.
Similar results were achieved in our colour reproduction test, the C763 achieving a score of 8.91. This is perhaps slightly behind what we were anticipating with many competing models scoring closer to 7.5, but difference shouldn't really be felt by the majority of consumers.
In our noise test the C763 impressed with a score of 0.68%. This is slightly below average and indicates clean shots with minimal visible noise. Our test shots were smooth and speckle-free. However, the C763 doesn't respond too well as you increase the sensitivity. The noise reduction algorithm does do a decent job of counteracting graininess, but this has a big impact on the clarity of the shots. There is also a substantial decrease in crispness at higher sensitivities, with noticeable colour bleeding and blurring. We don't recommend shooting with this model above ISO 200.
We also ran our usual series of speed tests, but were disappointed by the C763's performance. It exhibited 0.01 seconds of shutter lag, two seconds shot-to-shot time and a massive 3.5 seconds start up time, all of which are well below what we usually see from compact cameras.
The C763's feature set is fairly standard for a compact camera although there are some notable omissions. There is only a handful of white balance presets (auto, daylight, tungsten, fluorescent) with no manual mode. Similarly, ISO sensitivity only extends to ISO 400, with ISO 800 reducing the size of the picture to 1.2 megapixels. The burst mode is also quite sluggish, capturing 1.2 shots per second. Aside from this, there are a number of colour modes (sepia, regular and black and white), a smattering of scene modes as well as exposure bracketing. One irritating aspect of this mode is that all the camera's settings reset every time it is powered down, meaning if you have a specific configuration you like, you'll need to re-do it every time you use the unit.
The words 'pretty standard' continue to apply with regards to the C763's design. It follows the trend of previous Kodak compact models, sporting a slim, silver design that looks quite nice and slips easily into the pocket. It won't win any awards for aesthetics, but it looks smooth and should please most buyers. Keeping with the simplistic nature, the controls are quite minimalist, with a function wheel, menu button and five-way directional pad handling most of the work. Everything is laid out intuitively and should prove accessible, even for novice users.
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Google Pixel 5 Review: Soft Reboot
- 2 Google Pixel 4a review: The Goldilocks Google phone
- 3 Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G review: Wrong Number
- 4 LG NANO99 NanoCell 8K TV review: Prestige at a price
- 5 LG Velvet review: Fake it till you make it
Latest News Articles
- Got a GoPro Hero 8? You can use it as a webcam for your Mac
- Canon embolden mirrorless offering with EOS R5 and R6
- GoPro spin off their lighting mod into its own act: the Zeus Mini
- Canon adds a new heavyweight to their DSLR lineup: the EOS-1D X Mark III
- Panasonic's Lumix S1H has all the bells & whistles and the price-tag to match
PCW Evaluation Team
Ultimately this laptop has achieved everything I would hope for in a laptop for work, while fitting that into a form factor and weight that is remarkable.
This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.
It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.
As the Maserati or BMW of laptops, it would fit perfectly in the hands of a professional needing firepower under the hood, sophistication and class on the surface, and gaming prowess (sports mode if you will) in between.
The MSI PS63 is an amazing laptop and I would definitely consider buying one in the future.
This small mobile printer is exactly what I need for invoicing and other jobs such as sending fellow tradesman details or step-by-step instructions that I can easily print off from my phone or the Web.
- Best Australian Amazon Prime Day deals
- Why do gamers like RGB Lights?
- Huawei Matebook X Pro (2020) review: The real deal
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?