- Size and Shape, MP3 Player
- Small Controls and Screen, Keypad Issues, No Expandable Memory
The M6110 just doesn't offer enough for us to recommend it. It's lacking some more advanced features and you'll find it difficult and frustrating to operate.
Price$ 499.00 (AUD)
The LG M6100 MP3 phone is a compact handset that breaks the standard design tradition of current mobiles. LG are pushing this as a worthy replacement for a stand alone MP3 player and it wins points for this function thanks to playlist and equaliser support. Unfortunately it is let down by a small screen, lack of memory expansion slot and significant problems with the keypad.
The M6100 is marketed primarily as an MP3 phone. To date, we haven't seen a mobile phone that would enable you to throw away your iPod. The reason for this is primarily due to two main factors: storage capacity and interface. Motorola tried with the ROKR E1, however no company has released an intuitive interface like the iPod click-wheel on a mobile phone.
The MP3 player on the M6100 is commendable, but we still can't recommend the phone for this functionality alone. It includes a four-band equaliser, play-mode functions such as repeat and shuffle, and cool visual effect settings. You can create playlists and listen through an external speaker as well, but the latter isn't recommended if you want quality sound.
The biggest drawbacks of the M6100 (considering it's an MP3 phone) are the lack of a standard 3.5mm headphone jack and the fact that there is no expandable memory support on the handset. Both of these functions are critical for any multimedia player and mobile phones aren't an exception. The 128MB of included memory is generous for a mobile, but is simply not enough for a digital music player. Simply put, this phone is great as a basic backup MP3 player, but is missing the elements to make it your portable music device of choice.
The M6100 is a very small handset and weighs a mere 90 grams. Rather than continue with the theme of thin handsets such as Motorola's RAZR V3, LG has opted for a thicker casing but a shorter and narrower look. This design does have its advantages, but it causes problems as well. The screen has been cut to a very small size and both the keypad and controls have been sized down considerably. We struggled for comfort when operating the basic functions of the phone because of the small nature of the screen and buttons.
The phones graphite grey finish does look durable and we were left with an impression of a solid handset. The sliding mechanism worked without any problems and the phone doesn't seem to attract many fingerprints or smudges. The M6100 controls are fairly standard: there are two selection keys, a 5-way navigational pad with shortcuts, answer and end Call keys and a clear button. The user interface is a fresh looking 3 x 3 grid layout, but a larger display would have enhanced the user experience. As it stands the M6100 display is one of the smallest we've seen; even when compared with the Nokia 7380.
The M6100 keypad features small black buttons with a soft white backlight. Unfortunately, the buttons are cramped and not every key press registers on the handset - even when you think you have pressed the keys properly. This is especially evident when you are messaging with T9; it's a frequent occurrence that slows messages composition. This is definitely the biggest drawback of the M6100.
LG has equipped the M6100 with a fair list of features for such a compact phone including plenty of multimedia functions. There's a 1.3 megapixel camera with flash, a video camera and a voice recorder. The images the camera produces are lacking in colour and image noise is a problem. It does have a flash and self-timer mode though, with 4x digital zoom also a notable feature. The slide show function was unique, but on such a small display, we can't help but feel this feature is a bit of a waste.
The M6100 also includes calendar, memo, calculator, unit converter, world time, Java and WAP functions and Bluetooth and a USB cable for connectivity. According to LG figures, battery life is rated at 285 minutes of talk time and up to 155 hours of standby time. This isn't outstanding but for average usage (a handful of calls and SMS's per day), we found we only had to charge the phone every three days.
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 (2019) review
- 2 Oppo Reno Z Australian review (2019)
- 3 Motorola One Vision Australian review (2019)
- 4 Sony WF-1000XM3 Australian review: Flair, finesse and form
- 5 Samsung Galaxy A70 Australian review
Latest News Articles
- Huawei's Mate 30 Pro braces itself for life without Google
- The iPhone 11 and iPhone 11 Pro will be Telstra's first eSIM-friendly flagships
- Best iPhone 11 Optus Plans
- Here's how much the iPhone 11 Pro costs in Australia
- Here's how much the iPhone 11 Pro Max costs in Australia
PCW Evaluation Team
This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.
It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.
As the Maserati or BMW of laptops, it would fit perfectly in the hands of a professional needing firepower under the hood, sophistication and class on the surface, and gaming prowess (sports mode if you will) in between.
The MSI PS63 is an amazing laptop and I would definitely consider buying one in the future.
This small mobile printer is exactly what I need for invoicing and other jobs such as sending fellow tradesman details or step-by-step instructions that I can easily print off from my phone or the Web.
Microsoft Office continues to make a student’s life that little bit easier by offering reliable, easy to use, time-saving functionality, while continuing to develop new features that further enhance what is already a formidable collection of applications
- IFA 2019: Everything you need to know
- Hands-On: The Samsung Galaxy Fold is my new problematic fave
- Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ Australian review (2019)
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?