Although they have their pros and cons, cartridge-based printers can sometimes be more troublesome and frustrating to use than you’d like.
QNAP TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS device
QNAP's Atom-powered NAS has plenty of features
- Comprehensive server functionality, eSATA, good write speeds
- Slow read speeds and poor streaming performance, doesn't support HFS+ file systems
The TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS device is built for those who need 12TB of storage capacity but aren't fussed too much about speed. There are much faster - and cheaper - alternatives. However, the TS-659 Pro Turbo has plenty of server features to suit both the home and small offices.
Price$ 1,700.00 (AUD)
QNAP's TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS packs six drive bays and up to 12 terabytes of storage into a compact, energy-efficient box. Armed with Intel's Atom D510 processor and QNAP's latest firmware, this network-attached storage (NAS) device is a competent server, though its speed is disappointing.
There are very few aesthetic differences between the TS-659 Pro Turbo and TS-639 Pro Turbo we reviewed last year. The QNAP TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS looks like an elongated TS-459 Pro Turbo NAS, but two fans on the back of the chassis should help keep the hard drives extra cool. The brushed metal enclosure makes the TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS more attractive than the vast majority of plastic NAS devices. The NAS device's drive bays are individually lockable but they aren't tool-less (you'll need to screw the drives in prior to inserting the trays).
The QNAP TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS has four USB ports on the back panel, and a fifth at the front. A one-touch copy button can be configured to back up to or from external hard drives. Two eSATA ports allow for fast transfers from external storage, though the NAS device only supports ext3, ext4, NTFS and FAT32 file systems; hard drives with the HFS+ file system (used by Mac OS X) are not currently supported.
There are two Gigabit Ethernet ports on the back of the NAS device which support failover and load balancing. This means that both ports can balance network traffic over a single IP address; if one port fails, the other will simply continue operating as normal.
Intel's newest dual core Atom CPU, the D510, and 1GB of memory power the TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS. Clocked at 1.66GHz, the processor is built for low-power desktops rather than netbooks, so it will provide better performance than older Atom processors while retaining relatively low power consumption.
Considering the TS-659 Pro Turbo runs the same basic hardware as the TS-459 Pro Turbo, it is no surprise that power consumption is about the same. With two Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB hard drives running in a RAID 0 array, we found the NAS device consumed between 23.9 Watts and 42.8W.
We test all NAS devices by connecting them through a Gigabit Ethernet network to a testbed PC with a 300GB Western Digital Velociraptor hard drive. We run Intel's NAS Performance Toolkit, which determines how the NAS device performs when streaming 720p high-definition media from the device as well as the ability to record the same video while performing backup operations.
We also run two file transfer tests to see how the NAS device performs in the real word. One file transfer test uses 3000 1MB files; this is intensive for both the hard drives and the embedded processor, and a good indication of how it will perform when backing up your computer. In addition, we transfer 20GB worth of 3-4GB files, a faster test that is similar to dealing with large videos, disk images or database files.
|Intel's NAS Performance Toolkit - HD Streaming|
|HD Playback (MBps)||HD Playback &
|HD Playback &|
|QNAP TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS||$1700||3TB||RAID 0||41.3||46.5||29.5|
|Synology DiskStation DS509+||$1065||3TB||RAID 0||70||58||37.9|
|Thecus N7700||$1200||3TB||RAID 0||40.8||45.1||32.2|
|QNAP TS-459 Pro Turbo NAS||$1399||3TB||RAID 0||99.2||91.3||44.5|
|ProWare DN-500A-CM||$1599||3TB||RAID 0||56.5||68||33.2|
|Netgear ReadyNAS NVX||$2519||2TB||X-RAID2 (Redundancy)||69.05||50||33.1|
|QNAP TS-809 Pro Turbo NAS||$2699||4TB||RAID 0||75||102.2||41.6|
|Netgear ReadyNAS Pro Business Edition||$3669||3TB||RAID 0||44.4||48.5||30.4|
|Small File (3GB) Transfer Test Results|
|QNAP TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS||$1700||3TB||RAID 0||27||34.5||10.5|
|Synology DiskStation DS509+||$1065||3TB||RAID 0||45.5||30.3||14.8|
|Thecus N7700||$1200||3TB||RAID 0||57.6||25.4||12.9|
|QNAP TS-459 Pro Turbo NAS||$1399||3TB||RAID 0||51.7||38||18.4|
|ProWare DN-500A-CM||$1599||3TB||RAID 0||31.6||33.3||16.7|
|Netgear ReadyNAS NVX||$2519||2TB||X-RAID2 (Redundancy)||47.6||21.8||11.4|
|QNAP TS-809 Pro Turbo NAS||$2699||4TB||RAID 0||44||38||16.5|
|Netgear ReadyNAS Pro Business Edition||$3669||3TB||RAID 0||49.2||51.7||17.9|
|Large File (20GB) Transfer Test Results|
|QNAP TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS||$1700||3TB||RAID 0||32.8||55.9||20.3|
|Synology DiskStation DS509+||$1065||3TB||RAID 0||63.4||41.7||24.2|
|Thecus N7700||$1200||3TB||RAID 0||71.9||74.3||39.2|
|QNAP TS-459 Pro Turbo NAS||$1399||3TB||RAID 0||86.6||69||36.8|
|ProWare DN-500A-CM||$1599||3TB||RAID 0||40.4||43.5||19.4|
|Netgear ReadyNAS NVX||$2519||2TB||X-RAID2 (Redundancy)||78.5||51.7||25.8|
|QNAP TS-809 Pro Turbo NAS||$2699||4TB||RAID 0||85||74||43.7|
|Netgear ReadyNAS Pro Business Edition||$3669||3TB||RAID 0||88.2||78.5||38.2|
The TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS device's performance was in some instances half that of the cheaper, four-bay TS-459 Pro Turbo. Our benchmarks show that the NAS device falls behind similarly capable alternatives in Intel's NAS Performance Toolkit, while, surprisingly, reading data is slower than writing it. This is likely due to the SATA controller, which has to handle six drives simultaneously rather than four. Though the TS-659 Pro Turbo remains a reasonable performer, we would stick with the cheaper model for performance-intensive tasks.
Setting up the TS-659 Pro Turbo is incredibly easy; the NAS device's LCD screen provides "touch-n-go PC-less installation," which lets you set up a RAID array and encrypt volumes without having to install firmware first or use a bundled utility on a client PC. Once set up is completed, you will have access to the same useful AJAX-based interface that we've seen on previous QNAP NAS devices.
The clean interface makes configuration easy and there are plenty of wizards to guide users through basic tasks like setting up network protocols and changing user access rights or quotas.
Drives can be configured in RAID levels 0, 1, 5 and 6, as well as single or linear JBOD volumes. There are network protocols to suit Microsoft (SMB), Apple (AFP/Bonjour) and Linux (NFS), as well as FTP and secure HTTP servers.
The TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS device offers an iTunes server, as well as a Twonky Media-powered UPnP server that can stream music, videos and photos over a network to DLNA-compliant devices such as networked DVD players, media players and even some televisions. You can access a separate media browser through the Web interface, though this is little more than a file list; the audio and photo browsers available on Synology's NAS devices are much more useful.
Backups can be scheduled and configured to use external storage devices, remote servers and Amazon's S3 cloud storage platform. QNAP has also added direct compatibility with Apple's Time Machine, a feature which was previously difficult to set up on the company's NAS devices. Along with AES encryption for individual volumes, small businesses should benefit from an IP block-out system that can be configured for each network protocol, and a customisable firewall.
The iSCSI target feature isn't out of the ordinary, though we appreciate the ability to use the NAS device as an iSCSI server itself; simply enable the "Virtual Disk" feature to use other iSCSI targets as local storage.
The TS-659 Pro Turbo NAS device doesn't lack server features, but the data transfer and streaming performance is disappointing when compared to cheaper alternatives. If storage capacity takes precedence over speed, it is certainly worth a look.
Stay up to date with the latest news, reviews and features. Sign up to PC World’s newsletters
Follow PC World Australia on Twitter: @PCWorldAu
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Samsung Tab S4 review: Freestyle
- 2 Sony WF-SP900 review: One step forward, two steps back
- 3 Plantronics BackBeat Fit 3100 review: Safety first
- 4 Oppo R17 Pro review: Oppo's thriftiest flagship yet drives a hard bargain
- 5 Lenovo Smart Display review: The bigger, better buy
Latest News Articles
- Brother pitch themselves at SMBs with new 'Inkvestment' options
- Ted’s World of Imaging opening in Sydney
- McAfee QTR sees cryptocurrency mining surge continue in second quarter
- RMIT Online introduces two new Australian University courses for blockchain skills
- Telstra announces new IoT products to help locate things that matter most
PCW Evaluation Team
This small mobile printer is exactly what I need for invoicing and other jobs such as sending fellow tradesman details or step-by-step instructions that I can easily print off from my phone or the Web.
Microsoft Office continues to make a student’s life that little bit easier by offering reliable, easy to use, time-saving functionality, while continuing to develop new features that further enhance what is already a formidable collection of applications
I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)
It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!
The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
- CES 2019 Round-Up:
- Samsung’s Galaxy S10 will launch on Feb 20, and we only have one question
- Huawei Mate 20 Pro review: Full, in-depth, Australian review
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?