Now that the home entertainment market has moved towards streaming video services and Blu-ray content, there has never been a better time to convert DVD collections to digital.
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 x2
Less than twice the fun.
- Four DVI ports, 2GB of GDDR3 memory, superior cooling, improved 256-bit memory bus
- Prohibitively expensive, bulky dimensions, pipped at the post by NVIDIA’s GTX 280 card.
If you're a firm believer in the 'behemoth GPU', Sapphire's Radeon HD 4850 x2 will do little to sway your opinion. While it performed solidly enough in our benchmarks, it failed to match NVIDIA's single-GPU GTX 280 offering. Nevertheless, it remains a good option for any self-respecting Radeon fan with a penchant for monitors.
Price$ 793.00 (AUD)
In recent years, AMD has distanced itself from the high-performance single-GPU market in favour of cheaper, share-loading solutions. Much to the chagrin of 3-D traditionalists and hardcore gamers, its latest top-of-the-range offerings have all adopted a ‘dual core’ approach, with multiple GPUs crammed onto a single graphics card.
As you can probably guess from its name, the Radeon HD 4850 x2 is the latest addition to this contentious family, following in the footsteps of the Radeon HD3870 X2 and ATI Radeon HD 4870 x2. In theory, it combines the power of two ATI Radeon HD 4850s for a significant boost in speed and performance, though we did experience some mixed results during our benchmarks. With that being said, it will still provide the required grunt for modern 3-D gaming, and it comes with some nifty onboard features, including four DVI ports.
Like the costlier Radeon HD 4870 X2, the Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 x2 features two RV770 graphics processors on a single printed circuit board. For those out of the Radeon loop, RV770 is the foundation chip in ATI’s new generation of Series 4000 GPUs. Some of the improvements it offers over the previous chipset include a substantial increase in stream processors (up from 320 to 800), UVD2 support (which provides advanced Blu-ray/high-definition functionality) and a wider 256-bit memory bus. The HD 4850 version, released in June, comes with a memory clock speed of 1986MHz (effective), a core clock speed of 625MHz and between 512MB and 1GB of GDDR3 memory (depending on the model).
With its ‘double or nothing’ approach, the HD 4850 x2 boasts twice the specifications of its single-GPU cousin — that’s 1600 stream processors, two 256-bit memory processors and a whopping 2GB of GDDR3 memory (the core and memory clock speeds remain unchanged). It essentially uses ATI's CrossFire technology to render 3-D applications, with both GPUs sharing whatever processing tasks are thrown their way. On paper at least, this translates to faster rendering times and increased frame rates in games.
In terms of design, the HD 4850 x2 is an intimidating beast of a card, with dimensions that exceed everything else on the market. This could pose a problem for people with cramped cases, especially if they plan to set up a CrossfireX configuration. Curiously, the card requires both a six pin and an eight pin PCI connector to run, which puts it in the same league as the beefier HD 4870 x2. While this provides the card with up to 225 Watts of power, it also adds to the clutter — something this plus-sized card could do without.
For cooling, the HD 4850 x2 sports a sizeable heat sink connected to a pair of smart looking fans (one for each RV770 core). When the card was under load, we found the fans were slightly louder that we’re used to, though they shouldn’t be too distracting (provided you keep your speakers' volume at a respectable level). On the plus side, we found the card to be significantly cooler than the HD 4850 and HD 4870, which both suffered from potential overheating issues. You can also manually adjust the fans' speed (and racket) via ATI’s Catalyst Control tool.
As mentioned, the HD 4850 x2 also sports four DVI ports, which is twice the number of a typical card. This is great news for any monitor fetishists our there, who can attach up to four displays to their PC using just one card. Presumably, if you elect to set up a CrossFire configuration with two HD 4850 x2s, this can be extended to a frankly ridiculous eight monitors. All of these outputs can be converted to HDMI (complete with integrated HD 7.1 Audio) via a bundled adapter.
So what about those all-important gaming benchmarks? Unfortunately, this is the one area where the HD 4850 x2 failed to wholly impress. We tested the card on a Vista 32-bit machine equipped with 1GB of DDR2 RAM, a 750GB Barracuda ES hard drive and a 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Quad CPU. While it performed solidly enough, we were expecting a little more oomph from such a decked-out card. The NVIDIA-based Asus ENGTX280 TOP (HTDP/1G/A) (RRP: $699) managed to trump it in the majority of our tests. This probably says something about the advantages of single-GPU configurations, but we’ll leave that discussion for another time.
When we ran 3DMark 06, the Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 x2 received a score of 11,618. While this isn’t an awful result, the ENGTX280 TOP managed to beat it by 1107 marks, which is a pretty significant margin. In our DirectX 10 Crysis demo, the Sapphire card chugged along at 18.24 frames per second. This was much slower than the GTX card, which averaged a phenomenal 37.32fps. (To be fair, Crysis has never been particularly kind to Radeon cards, which is why ATI neglects to include the game in most of its in-house benchmarks.)
In the DX10 game Call of Juarez, the HD 4850 x2 came out on top, averaging an impressive 69.9fps (compared to 50.9fps on the ENGTX280 TOP). However, the good news ended when we ran the game Lost Planet: Extreme Conditions, with the ENGTX280 TOP’s average of 97.5fps smashing the HD 4850 x2’s 72.5fps.
With an RRP of $793, the HD 4850 x2 is far from cheap. In fact, it would be more cost-effective to fit your PC with two Radeon HD 4850 cards, though this will naturally require a CrossFire-capable motherboard and also takes up more room.
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo R15 Pro review: A compelling mid-tier option with lots of value and few compromises
- 2 Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 review: A budget phablet that swings above its weight
- 3 LG E8 OLED TV (2018) and SK10Y soundbar review: If you've been on the fence about OLED, now might be the time to jump it
- 4 Nokia 7 Plus review: Predictable and plus-sized
- 5 Huawei P20 Pro review: See it and believe the hype
Latest News Articles
- QNAP Unveils the TS-1635AX 16-bay NAS
- Razer debut the first Opto-Mechanical keyboards in the form of the new Huntman and Huntsman Elite
- Samsung brings the Samsung Fl!p to Australia
- Intel CEO resigns after probe of relationship with employee
- Computex 2018: G.Skill draw eyes with new 'Crystal-RGB' RAM and new gaming gear
PCW Evaluation Team
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.
Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category
The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
- Oppo R15 Pro review: A compelling mid-tier option with lots of value and few compromises
- ASUS Zenbook Pro 15: A futuristic, exciting, imperfect, flagship notebook
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 review: A budget phablet that swings above its weight
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?