Sharp LC52LE820X LED television
Sharp LC52LE820X review: An LED television with Quattron technology.
- Excellent black levels and contrast levels
- The extra yellow sub-pixel makes some colours look unnatural, reflective panel, no IPTV via Ethernet, no 3D support
The Sharp Quattron LC52LE820X is a great TV when it comes to contrast, black levels and displaying fine image detail, but its colour needs some tweaking. We're disappointed by its lack of extra features like 3D and IPTV, though.
Price$ 3,499.00 (AUD)
The Sharp LC52LE820X is a 52in, LED-backlit LCD television that uses Sharp's Quattron technology. Quattron adds a yellow sub-pixel to the normal red, green and blue sub-pixels in an attempt to let the TV display more vivid colour. We're not sold on this technology, but the television does offer excellent black levels and detail in high contrast scenes. Unfortunately it lacks the Internet connectivity and 3D features of similarly priced TVs from competing brands like Sony, Samsung, LG and Panasonic.
Sharp LC52LE820X: Design, connectivity and features
The design of the Sharp LC52LE820X reminds us of an Apple iPad in landscape orientation. The TV has smooth rounded corners and dark bezel around a grey panel; it looks attractive but it's nothing original. The television is solidly constructed, with a cylindrical swivelling stand and thick glass base. We like the illuminated chevron in the middle of the lower bezel — it's a nice design element that stops the television from looking bland.
The Sharp LC52LE820X has a similar connectivity specification sheet to other high-end LED and plasma televisions. Four HDMI ports will take care of all the digital video devices any average home is likely to have, and VGA, composite and component video are also included. There's also a single USB port on the LC52LE820X's side and a wired Ethernet port — but no wireless connectivity.
There's no 3D support and no IPTV video-on-demand features built in to the Sharp LC52LE820X. This is surprising in a year where almost every other LCD or plasma television released by Panasonic, Sony, LG and Samsung has Internet features. Given the number of times we've quickly jumped on to YouTube to watch a music video during a commercial break, we think it's a feature that will be sorely missed on this television model — especially when it's competing with the Samsung Series 7 (UA55C7000) LED TV, LG 55LE7500 LED TV and Sony BRAVIA KDL-46HX800 LED TV.
Sharp LC52LE820X: Picture quality, contrast and colour
We were a bit iffy about Sharp's supposedly revolutionary new Quattron technology when it was announced; we've never had any problems with the colour accuracy and vibrancy of 'regular' LCD and plasma televisions. Without getting too technical, a normal LCD or plasma television uses three sub-pixels in each pixel, one for each of the red, green and blue colours recorded by the imaging sensor in a video camera. RGB is the standard used for broadcast television, DVD and Blu-ray, but Sharp has decided that it's not good enough and has added a fourth sub-pixel with a yellow colour. Sharp alleges that Quattron televisions "improve colour expressiveness and picture quality" even when displaying regular RGB content shot on RGB cameras and destined for RGB televisions. We're not convinced...
We had the Sharp LC52LE820X set up next to a Samsung Series 7 3D plasma television and took turns displaying a range of content on each after a small amount of calibration. Apart from the expected small differences in each television's display of colours, we didn't find the Sharp LC52LE820X to display any incredible difference in colour vibrancy. During most tests we actually found the Samsung TV displayed more accurate and lifelike colours. The default modes of the Sharp LC52LE820X can look overly vivid and rob detail from saturated areas of the screen — we opted to use the Movie mode as it offered the most reasonable colour representation.
The Sharp LC52LE820X is definitely able to produce vibrant colour with impressive contrast and deep black levels. Since it's a backlit LED panel rather than an edge-lit one (used in slimmer LED televisions), individual LEDs are able to be dimmed or turned off to produce deep black levels while maintaining detail in dark and bright areas of the screen. If you're watching high quality movie content with lots of especially difficult-to-display bright and dark scenes — The Blu-ray version of The Dark Knight is a great example of this — it's important to get a television that can display as much of this information as possible. The Sharp LC52LE820X does an excellent job.
Sharp LC52LE820X: Environmental policy and conclusion
Sharp's environmental policy details its commitment to minimise its environmental impact.
The Sharp LC52LE820X does a great job of displaying footage from Blu-ray movies and other 1080p content, but we can't help but be disappointed by the lack of extra features given the reasonably high price tag. We may not be fans of 3D at this point in time, but to see it missing when competitors like the Samsung Series 7, Sony BRAVIA KDL-46HX800 and LG 47LX9500 LED television have 3D included is a definite disadvantage for Sharp. The lack of even basic IPTV features is another blow.
Become a fan of GoodGearGuide on Facebook
Follow GoodGearGuide on Twitter: @GoodGearGuide
Stay up to date with the latest reviews. Sign up to GoodGearGuide’s Gear Daily newsletters
Join the newsletter!
Apple iMac Pro
Cartier Calibre de Cartier Diver Watch
Samsung QLED 8K TV
Bang and Olufsen Beoplay A9 Speaker
Ballistix Sport AT
Ballistix Tactical Tracer RGB 3000
Toys for Boys
Tivoli PAL BT
Osmo Coding Awbie Game
Little Bits DROID Inventor Kit
ESET Internet Security
ESET Cyber Security Pro for Mac
ESET Smart Security Premium
Oregon Pro WMR500 Weather Station
Nix Pro Colour Sensor
Ultimate Ears Wonderboom Bluetooth Speaker
SmartLens - Clip on Phone Camera Lens Set of 3
Ikea RIGGAD work lamp with wireless charging
TimeFlip Magnet Simple Time Tracking Device
Naztech Xtra Drive Mini + 256GB microSD Card
In multicultural Australia, the opportunity for home cooks to expand their culinary horizons is too tempting to resist.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo R17 Pro review: Oppo's thriftiest flagship yet drives a hard bargain
- 2 Nokia 7.1 review: A modest and modern mid-tier option
- 3 Tenda Nova MW6 review: A gateway drug for mesh Wi-Fi
- 4 Huawei Mate 20 Pro review: Expensive, but probably the best phone you can buy right now
- 5 Apple iPhone XS review: Astonishment at a price
Latest News Articles
- Hisense's first OLED TV finally gets Australian pricing and availability
- Samsung announces availability of 2nd Gen Frame TV
- Hisense unveils Designer Collection range in partnership with Harvey Norman
- IFA 2018: TCL unveils first 8K TV, confirms it'll come to Australia in 2019
- IFA 2018: Samsung refresh The Frame
PCW Evaluation Team
Microsoft Office continues to make a student’s life that little bit easier by offering reliable, easy to use, time-saving functionality, while continuing to develop new features that further enhance what is already a formidable collection of applications
I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)
It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!
The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
- PC World 2018 Editor's Choice Awards
- Huawei Mate 20 Pro review: Full, in-depth, Australian review
- Razer Phone 2 review: One for the fans
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?