Symantec Norton Internet Security 2009 beta
How is it looking?
- Install time, user interface, Norton Insight, silent mode
- Location of CPU usage meter may be a little obscure, AntiPhishing issues
The beta of NIS 2009 shows that Symantec is on track to vastly improve performance in Norton. The UI is clear and uncluttered, putting front and centre only the elements most users need to see, while allowing for easy drill-down for those who want more. Having said that, we'd like the CPU usage meter to be easier to access. It would match the product's one-click ease of use in other areas. Still, with so much performance enhancement, such quibbles get left in the dust of this speedy, smooth new suite.
Security software customers are speaking with their feet: they want security updates and other security interruptions out of their faces, and they won't hesitate to dump their security suites because of performance drag - whether or not it's actually the security software that's to blame.
That's why Symantec is working on the next iteration of Norton Internet Security, NIS 2009, with the mantra of what it's calling Zero Impact Performance: "Security so light and fast you never even know it's there - until you need it."
We're talking about more than 300 major overhauls that the company asserts will affect almost every aspect of the security suite, from scanning engines to user interface. Symantec says that NIS 2009, released to public beta on July 14 and due to ship in the Autumn (September 16 is our current best guess), will include the industry's fastest protection updates, half the memory usage of its next-most-memory-stingy competitor (BitDefender Internet Security 2008) and a blink-of-an-eye install time of one minute.
Interestingly, Symantec says that underpowered systems with pre-existing performance problems are the root cause of the majority of complaints it receives in its support centre every month. A Symantec representative stated that of some 1 million people who contact Norton technical support monthly, 40 percent are running PCs with 512MB or less of RAM and 75 percent memory utilisation, and another 31 percent are running with 1GB of RAM and 57 percent memory utilisation.
So in order to test Symantec's Zero Impact Performance promise, the system we chose to run the beta on was a sputtering lemon - an older, underpowered Windows XP machine with performance problems.
The results? After having suffered far too long under the tyranny of Norton Internet Security 2008's constant intrusions and the near-comatose reaction time of an outdated system, we found that the beta actually delivered the goods.
Join the newsletter!
When the Hypertext Transfer Protocol was introduced nearly 30 years ago, the Internet was a small, cozy club hosting just one website.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo Find X review: Damn.
- 2 Dell G5 review: Easy to live with
- 3 HAVIT G1W True Wireless Earbuds review: Budget buds with a wireless edge
- 4 Huawei Nova 3e: P20 in a pinch
- 5 Sonos Beam review: A more-affordable, smarter soundbar option
Latest News Articles
- Security experts hack unsuspecting family’s Amazon Echo
- Swann launches voice integrations via Google Assistant for multi-camera wired systems
- Encryption: Has the government stuck to its ‘no backdoors’ pledge?
- Federal Govt releases proposed reform to access encrypted communications
- Malwarebytes Global Study examines the true costs of Cybercrime in Australia
PCW Evaluation Team
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.
Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category
The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
- Samsung Galaxy Note 9: Full, in-depth, Australian review
- Oppo Find X: Full, in-depth review
- Panasonic FZ1000U OLED TV: Full, in-depth, review
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?