THQ Destroy all Humans! Path of the Furon
Much like 1970s pop culture, the humour in this game is both irritating and bland.
- Open-world destruction and exploration, wide variety of powers and weapons
- Horrible script, lame jokes, annoying voice acting, unresponsive physics
While Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon may provide some brief fun for series newcomers, the overall package won't impress anyone in the long run.
Price$ 99.95 (AUD)
Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon fills me with a sense of dread. All the series' trademark humour and inventive gameplay has been woefully absent since Destroy All Humans 2, and Path of the Furon is no different. Much like 1970s pop culture, the humour in this game is both irritating and bland, and nothing looks (or plays) as good as it should.
Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon is a surprise, primarily because it disappoints right out of the gate, especially if you suffered through the last title in the franchise, Big Willy Unleashed. Just like Crypto's stale Jack Nicholson impression, the writing seems to have suffered in development, especially since a lot of the jokes come of as forced or just plain bad. In Path of the Furon, Crypto is living the life of a rich, spoiled, power-hungry Las Vegas casino mogul. Some competition wheels into town from the local Mafia, but things get more universal when a threat from Crypto's home planet forces him to get off his lazy butt and start some havoc.
Destroy All Gameplay
It's apparent early in the game that many things are unfinished or simply missing. When I booted up the disc, I was eager to see what the Unreal Engine did with the environments and in-game models. Here's a hint: it does pretty much nothing. The way I understand it, the Unreal Engine does some science-voodoo magic that makes game in-objects move realistically. This happens rarely in Path of the Furon. Debris will clatter around wide open spaces like pool balls in a barrel, large pieces of levels pop in and out of view at random, and textures look reminiscent of 2001 Xbox titles. It's a shame, too -- if I could rate the game solely on its gameplay, I'd give it a better score. If you're new to series, you'll at least have some fun using Crypto's powers (telekinesis, time manipulation, etc.) and weapons in Path of the Furon's GTA-inspired open world.
Crap of the Furon
At first, I didn't notice how poorly written the game was because I made frequent use of my TV's "mute" button. Crypto's Nicholson-impression aside, many of the jokes in this game suffer from weak delivery and bad execution. I can't help but feel that the writers are unsuccessfully trying to piggyback on the humor of Invader Zim -- the problem is, they're just not good at doing it. I'm not going to lie, the story's take on 1970s American lifestyle got a few chuckles out of me, but not much more. Since developer Sandblast Games has been shut down, I hope that Pandemic takes control of the series (again) and tries a storyline that doesn't crib from more tired jokes and pop culture. Heck, the 1980s would almost certainly yield better, funnier material for any future games.
Say what you will about Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon's shoddy graphics, lame script and bad physics -- when you throw it in the trash, it at least lands inside of the can instead of embedding itself in the wall.
Join the newsletter!
Cartier Calibre de Cartier Diver Watch
Samsung QLED 8K TV
Ballistix Sport AT
Ballistix Tactical Tracer RGB 3000
Apple iMac Pro
Bang and Olufsen Beoplay A9 Speaker
Toys for Boys
Little Bits DROID Inventor Kit
Osmo Coding Awbie Game
ESET Internet Security
Tivoli PAL BT
ESET Cyber Security Pro for Mac
Nix Pro Colour Sensor
ESET Smart Security Premium
Oregon Pro WMR500 Weather Station
Ultimate Ears Wonderboom Bluetooth Speaker
SmartLens - Clip on Phone Camera Lens Set of 3
Ikea RIGGAD work lamp with wireless charging
Naztech Xtra Drive Mini + 256GB microSD Card
TimeFlip Magnet Simple Time Tracking Device
Ransomware has been one of the most prolific malware families for years, generating financial losses for targeted users and organizations, as well as significant revenue for cybercriminals.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo R17 Pro review: Oppo's thriftiest flagship yet drives a hard bargain
- 2 Nokia 7.1 review: A modest and modern mid-tier option
- 3 Tenda Nova MW6 review: A gateway drug for mesh Wi-Fi
- 4 Huawei Mate 20 Pro review: Expensive, but probably the best phone you can buy right now
- 5 Apple iPhone XS review: Astonishment at a price
Latest News Articles
- Fortnite and PUBG could be banned in China
- Epic Games cuts the once-loved 'Infinity Blade' series from the App Store
- Resident Evil 2 Hands On Preview
- PC World 2018 Editor's Choice Awards Nominees Announced
- Support for AUD finally comes to Steam (with a catch)
PCW Evaluation Team
Microsoft Office continues to make a student’s life that little bit easier by offering reliable, easy to use, time-saving functionality, while continuing to develop new features that further enhance what is already a formidable collection of applications
I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)
It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!
The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
- PC World 2018 Editor's Choice Awards
- Huawei Mate 20 Pro review: Full, in-depth, Australian review
- Razer Phone 2 review: One for the fans
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?