WaveMaker Visual Ajax Studio

WaveMaker Visual Ajax Studio
  • WaveMaker Visual Ajax Studio
  • WaveMaker Visual Ajax Studio
  • Expert Rating

    4.00 / 5

Pros

  • Quick and easy Web apps, suits casual programmers

Cons

  • Editing window not as good as a proper IDE, still need someone who understands what's going on "behind the scenes" when something goes wrong

Bottom Line

WaveMaker's visual tool allows new developers and talented HTML jockeys to build full J2EE Web applications with a few clicks—zero to CRUD (create, update, delete data) in five minutes or less. Help from a Java professional may be needed to debug arm-length stack traces when you step off the well-groomed path.

Would you buy this?

There was a moment in history when assembly coding and the knowledge of it largely disappeared from the world. Before it, the programmers knew and cared about the binary code the CPU saw, even if they relied upon a compiler to build much of it. After that moment, integrated development environments (IDEs) came along and did so many things automatically that programmers stopped caring about such things as linking or op codes.

We're reaching that moment in Web development today, thanks in part to fancy front ends like WaveMaker's Visual Ajax Studio. In years past, Java programmers would write deployment descriptors, Hibernate configuration files and endless files filled with XML just to stitch together all of the JSPs and database calls. After WaveMaker, we can almost sit back and forget about firing up vi or Emacs to get a Web application running.

Monolithic Web applications have become almost standard in the world of SQL reports and most other kinds of data processing, but, just as the cobbler's children always went barefoot, programmers have been the last to jump on this bandwagon. Real programmers use vi, right? Not anymore. You start building a Web application in WaveMaker by going to a Web page with the word "Dashboard" at the top, the kind of term that usually indicates the Web page is built for pointy-haired bosses and the folks down in marketing who can't grok XML.

Once you go to this Web page, you can import a data model from a database by pushing a little icon button with a plus sign on it. You don't write SQL, JDBC or any of the Hibernate configuration code. Then you click on a few more icons to create some services—note that the Dashboard doesn't call them "Web services" or WSDL as a proper programmer would do, but the subsequent pages do. After that, you push the plus sign under the Pages headline and you're pretty much produced a Web application without using a single acronym. As Dire Straits almost put it, "That ain't working/Money for nothing and your clicks for free."

Java for dummies

I'm exaggerating a bit. Building a full Web application is not as simple as getting rich after MTV plays your music video—something that's also gone the way of binary code. But WaveMaker has stripped away plenty of the endless monotony of building Java applications by putting a pretty face on much of the endless editing of the configuration files. Naturally, creating user interfaces is also easy. The main layout page lets you drag and drop components in place. Most of the components are drawn from the Dojo hierarchy.

The result is very simple but not as powerful as if someone took Ant or Maven and slapped a slick AJAX interface on it. The basic functions are powerful, but there aren't many of them and they aren't as customisable as several of the neat Ant and Maven tools. The data model tool will respond to a few clicks and import an entire database with the JDBC interface's mechanism for reading the tables and data structures. But then it turns around and creates a Web service for adding and deleting an element for each and every possible row in each and every table. That's probably a bit excessive, and I found that I had to toss away many of them and tweak a few.

It's clear that the guys at WaveMaker didn't set out to build something that outdoes Maven at its own game. They wanted to create the equivalent of, say, Microsoft Access or PowerBuilder for the Web, using Java technology hidden underneath. They did a good job. I was able to whip off some basic systems in just a few minutes. When I hit roadblocks, I was able to figure out the limitations pretty quickly.

The limitations were fairly obvious any time I tried to do something a bit differently. One of the options when you build a Service is to put a Java class or a POJO (plain old Java object) to handle any arbitrary demand. This is simple to do and it works well—as long as you write clean Java code. I got odd messages when I wrote code that wouldn't compile correctly because I used the wrong type. The editing window for these POJOs just isn't as powerful as Eclipse or any of the other tools built for real programmers.

Is the trade-off worth it? For many casual programmers, I think the answer is an enthusiastic yes. Java technology continues to be well-regarded and relatively robust, but it is usually harder to configure and maintain because all of the powerful features add complexity. A tool such as WaveMaker would be ideal for a Java shop that wanted to hire the kind of folks who can stitch together 10 lines of PHP or Python. WaveMaker hides all of that Java confusion.

Making waves

Skilled programmers with years of experience customizing the J2EE stack, though, will start rattling the tin cup against the cell door—but not as quickly as they might expect. Decent solutions can often be found in the simple point-and-click world, but it frequently helps to have access to someone with deep Java experience when you try something a bit odd. Those endless Java stackdumps can be pretty daunting.

The biggest competitors will be Java tools like Grails, other languages like Ruby on Rails, and any of the JavaScript/AJAX libraries that live on Web services. Although I think Grails is an amazing platform, it's built by people who use text editors, so it's easiest for the text-editor dweller to use. If you like Maven and using an editor to set up your configuration files just right, WaveMaker won't be your solution.

The AJAX tools from Tibco and JackBe offer very similar tools for design. They also let you come pretty close to building your user interface by dragging and dropping the various components. They have similar editors and, to a certain extent, a similar architecture.

But there are deep differences in some places. JackBe, for instance, invested heavily in building a much more solid server-side framework for mixing and matching data on the server. This kind of feature can be essential in environments with sensitive data that shouldn't travel outside the firewall. You could accomplish much of the same by writing your own Java code with WaveMaker, but that's not as close to point-and-click as JackBe's Presto.

WaveMaker is one of the first tool vendors to adopt the AGPL (Affero General Public License), the new version of the GPL aimed at server-based code. If you choose this route, you can have the stack for free, but you need to release any and all modifications to the stack if you put up a running server with it. Tibco's General Interface is available under the BSD license, which requires no distribution of your modifications.

Most big development shops will probably skip the open-source options, at least for serious projects. WaveMaker's commercial subscriptions top out at $10,000 for unlimited Java virtual machines and include "certified software, updates and upgrades, proactive alerts, and full production-level technical support." That pretty much bundles everything together in one big package—just like the tool wraps up all of the fun of building a basic Web front end to a database.

Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments

Cool Tech

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

Featured Content

Product Launch Showcase

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?