WaveMaker Visual Ajax Studio
- Quick and easy Web apps, suits casual programmers
- Editing window not as good as a proper IDE, still need someone who understands what's going on "behind the scenes" when something goes wrong
WaveMaker's visual tool allows new developers and talented HTML jockeys to build full J2EE Web applications with a few clicks—zero to CRUD (create, update, delete data) in five minutes or less. Help from a Java professional may be needed to debug arm-length stack traces when you step off the well-groomed path.
Price$ 5,000.00 (AUD)
There was a moment in history when assembly coding and the knowledge of it largely disappeared from the world. Before it, the programmers knew and cared about the binary code the CPU saw, even if they relied upon a compiler to build much of it. After that moment, integrated development environments (IDEs) came along and did so many things automatically that programmers stopped caring about such things as linking or op codes.
We're reaching that moment in Web development today, thanks in part to fancy front ends like WaveMaker's Visual Ajax Studio. In years past, Java programmers would write deployment descriptors, Hibernate configuration files and endless files filled with XML just to stitch together all of the JSPs and database calls. After WaveMaker, we can almost sit back and forget about firing up vi or Emacs to get a Web application running.
Monolithic Web applications have become almost standard in the world of SQL reports and most other kinds of data processing, but, just as the cobbler's children always went barefoot, programmers have been the last to jump on this bandwagon. Real programmers use vi, right? Not anymore. You start building a Web application in WaveMaker by going to a Web page with the word "Dashboard" at the top, the kind of term that usually indicates the Web page is built for pointy-haired bosses and the folks down in marketing who can't grok XML.
Once you go to this Web page, you can import a data model from a database by pushing a little icon button with a plus sign on it. You don't write SQL, JDBC or any of the Hibernate configuration code. Then you click on a few more icons to create some services—note that the Dashboard doesn't call them "Web services" or WSDL as a proper programmer would do, but the subsequent pages do. After that, you push the plus sign under the Pages headline and you're pretty much produced a Web application without using a single acronym. As Dire Straits almost put it, "That ain't working/Money for nothing and your clicks for free."
Java for dummies
I'm exaggerating a bit. Building a full Web application is not as simple as getting rich after MTV plays your music video—something that's also gone the way of binary code. But WaveMaker has stripped away plenty of the endless monotony of building Java applications by putting a pretty face on much of the endless editing of the configuration files. Naturally, creating user interfaces is also easy. The main layout page lets you drag and drop components in place. Most of the components are drawn from the Dojo hierarchy.
The result is very simple but not as powerful as if someone took Ant or Maven and slapped a slick AJAX interface on it. The basic functions are powerful, but there aren't many of them and they aren't as customisable as several of the neat Ant and Maven tools. The data model tool will respond to a few clicks and import an entire database with the JDBC interface's mechanism for reading the tables and data structures. But then it turns around and creates a Web service for adding and deleting an element for each and every possible row in each and every table. That's probably a bit excessive, and I found that I had to toss away many of them and tweak a few.
It's clear that the guys at WaveMaker didn't set out to build something that outdoes Maven at its own game. They wanted to create the equivalent of, say, Microsoft Access or PowerBuilder for the Web, using Java technology hidden underneath. They did a good job. I was able to whip off some basic systems in just a few minutes. When I hit roadblocks, I was able to figure out the limitations pretty quickly.
The limitations were fairly obvious any time I tried to do something a bit differently. One of the options when you build a Service is to put a Java class or a POJO (plain old Java object) to handle any arbitrary demand. This is simple to do and it works well—as long as you write clean Java code. I got odd messages when I wrote code that wouldn't compile correctly because I used the wrong type. The editing window for these POJOs just isn't as powerful as Eclipse or any of the other tools built for real programmers.
Is the trade-off worth it? For many casual programmers, I think the answer is an enthusiastic yes. Java technology continues to be well-regarded and relatively robust, but it is usually harder to configure and maintain because all of the powerful features add complexity. A tool such as WaveMaker would be ideal for a Java shop that wanted to hire the kind of folks who can stitch together 10 lines of PHP or Python. WaveMaker hides all of that Java confusion.
Skilled programmers with years of experience customizing the J2EE stack, though, will start rattling the tin cup against the cell door—but not as quickly as they might expect. Decent solutions can often be found in the simple point-and-click world, but it frequently helps to have access to someone with deep Java experience when you try something a bit odd. Those endless Java stackdumps can be pretty daunting.
The AJAX tools from Tibco and JackBe offer very similar tools for design. They also let you come pretty close to building your user interface by dragging and dropping the various components. They have similar editors and, to a certain extent, a similar architecture.
But there are deep differences in some places. JackBe, for instance, invested heavily in building a much more solid server-side framework for mixing and matching data on the server. This kind of feature can be essential in environments with sensitive data that shouldn't travel outside the firewall. You could accomplish much of the same by writing your own Java code with WaveMaker, but that's not as close to point-and-click as JackBe's Presto.
WaveMaker is one of the first tool vendors to adopt the AGPL (Affero General Public License), the new version of the GPL aimed at server-based code. If you choose this route, you can have the stack for free, but you need to release any and all modifications to the stack if you put up a running server with it. Tibco's General Interface is available under the BSD license, which requires no distribution of your modifications.
Most big development shops will probably skip the open-source options, at least for serious projects. WaveMaker's commercial subscriptions top out at $10,000 for unlimited Java virtual machines and include "certified software, updates and upgrades, proactive alerts, and full production-level technical support." That pretty much bundles everything together in one big package—just like the tool wraps up all of the fun of building a basic Web front end to a database.
Join the newsletter!
LiTMUS LAB Dakota Side Table
Bang and Olufsen Beosound Stage - Dolby Atmos Soundbar
WD My Passport™ SSD
Amazon Echo Dot with Clock (4th Gen)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Apple Watch Series 6
Toys for Boys
Sony Playstation 5
WD_BLACK™ SN850 NVMe™ SSD
Theragun PRO Percussive Therapy Device
Bose SoundLink Revolve Bluetooth Speaker
ASUS ROG, ACRONYM partner for Special Edition Zephyrus G14
Nakamichi Delta 100 3-Way Hi Fi Speaker System
Sony WF-1000XM3 Wireless Noise Cancelling Headphones
Fujiflim Instax Square SQ1
Fender Fullerton Ukele
Lego Mindstorms Robot Inventor
Mario Kart Live: Home Circuit for Nintendo Switch
MSI Modern 14
Garmin vívofit® jr. 2
Philips Sonicare Diamond Clean 9000 Toothbrush
Kindle Paperwhite eReader (10th Gen)
Teac 7 inch Swivel Screen Portable DVD Player
SunnyBunny Snowflakes 20 LED Solar Powered Fairy String
MSI GE66 Dragonshield Limited Edition
Dickie Toy Remote Control Mega Crane Set
The MSI PS63 is an amazing laptop and I would definitely consider buying one in the future.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo Watch review: A masterclass in imitation
- 2 Google Pixel 5 Review: Soft Reboot
- 3 Google Pixel 4a review: The Goldilocks Google phone
- 4 Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G review: Wrong Number
- 5 LG NANO99 NanoCell 8K TV review: Prestige at a price
Latest News Articles
- Google smart displays get sticky notes for family members
- Google releases Chrome 87 with support for Apple silicon Macs
- Microsoft updates trackpad and mouse support, start screens and Ribbon in Office for iPad
- New software program runs Windows directly on Chromebooks
- Optus to take the lag out of gaming
PCW Evaluation Team
Ultimately this laptop has achieved everything I would hope for in a laptop for work, while fitting that into a form factor and weight that is remarkable.
This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.
It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.
As the Maserati or BMW of laptops, it would fit perfectly in the hands of a professional needing firepower under the hood, sophistication and class on the surface, and gaming prowess (sports mode if you will) in between.
The MSI PS63 is an amazing laptop and I would definitely consider buying one in the future.
This small mobile printer is exactly what I need for invoicing and other jobs such as sending fellow tradesman details or step-by-step instructions that I can easily print off from my phone or the Web.
- iPhone 12 Pro review: The iPhone that’s future proof
- Google Pixel 5 Review: Soft Reboot
- Oppo Watch review: A masterclass in imitation
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?