ZTE Blade Vec review: A serious budget contender
All the right ingredients
- Big and bright display
- Well priced
- Uninspired, plastic body
- Limited 1GB RAM
Price$ 249.00 (AUD)
The budget smartphone scene is dense in population. Currently more sub-$300 smartphones are on sale in the market than we can count on two hands. The Blade Vec needs to be memorable for the company to have any chance.
And parts of it are, such as the screen. It has a 1280x720 resolution spanning across 5-inches in a body marginally taller than Apple’s iPhone 6. Each inch crams 294 pixels — just as Motorola’s fantastic Moto G — except it is capable of exceptional levels of brightness. Screens of this calibre are a rarity at the Blade Vec’s price, and its inclusion enriches every facet of this smartphone’s experience.
Further separating the Blade Vec from the budget pack are its two cameras. The rear 8-megapixel and front 5 megapixel cameras are above par on the colour and clarity front, while the inclusion of a clever panorama mode and HDR make it that much easier to memorialise moments.
Neither of the cameras are perfect, with handicaps including a primitive user interface and a slow autofocus. These drawbacks are minor and don’t thwart the Blade Vec’s overall imaging.
Tucked into the left side of the Blade’s all-plastic body are trays good for two SIMs and a microSD card. The first tray is compatible with HSPA Internet speeds, and will work with the 850MHz network used by Telstra and Vodafone, along with the 900MHz of Optus’ network. The second tray is reserved for voice and text over 2G alone.
Dual-SIM smartphones can be geared to save money. A SIM attached to a cheap data plan can be used in the first tray, while another competitive on voice rates can be used in the second. The Blade Vec has software that automates which SIM is used for calls, texting and data.
The operating system is a near-vanilla version of Android 4.4 KitKat. Changes are limited to the lock screen, the appearance of icons and a small number of settings. Some third-party applications are added for flavour. Otherwise, that’s about it.
The software is clean and uncluttered. Running a near-stock version of Android is a win for the ZTE in our perspective as overlays can be inconsistent and inefficient. We only hope the company goes the extra mile by delivering timely software updates.
Sifting through the software is a 1.3GHz quad-core CPU, 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage. More often than not the hardware delivers a brisk experience, but from time to time you will see the seams, where the limited RAM is straining to keep everything quick, and noticing the hiccups does make this smartphone feel cheap.
Further dampening the experience is the fact the Blade Vec doesn’t support microSDXC, which means it will only work with cards 32GB in size or less.
Read more: Oppo breaks into Australian retail stores
Adding insult to injury is the texture of the ZTE smartphone. Every panel save for the screen is cheap plastic; it’s liberal use makes the smartphone feel cheaper than its $249 price would have you believe. Other smartphones make use of plastic, including the Moto G and Nokia Lumia 635, but these mould the material to ergonomic and inspired shapes.
The Blade Vec is not the best nor the worst of phones. ZTE has made a solid alternative to the champions of the budget market, and the company has gone one further by undercutting Motorola and Nokia on price.
Join the newsletter!
Ballistix Sport AT
Ballistix Tactical Tracer RGB 3000
Cartier Calibre de Cartier Diver Watch
Samsung QLED 8K TV
Apple iMac Pro
Toys for Boys
ESET Internet Security
ESET Cyber Security Pro for Mac
Nix Pro Colour Sensor
Osmo Coding Awbie Game
ESET Smart Security Premium
Little Bits DROID Inventor Kit
Tivoli PAL BT
Oregon Pro WMR500 Weather Station
TimeFlip Magnet Simple Time Tracking Device
Naztech Xtra Drive Mini + 256GB microSD Card
SmartLens - Clip on Phone Camera Lens Set of 3
Ultimate Ears Wonderboom Bluetooth Speaker
Ikea RIGGAD work lamp with wireless charging
This Holiday Season, protect yourself and your loved ones with the best. Buy now for Holiday Savings!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Oppo R17 Pro review: Oppo's thriftiest flagship yet drives a hard bargain
- 2 Nokia 7.1 review: A modest and modern mid-tier option
- 3 Tenda Nova MW6 review: A gateway drug for mesh Wi-Fi
- 4 Huawei Mate 20 Pro review: Expensive, but probably the best phone you can buy right now
- 5 Apple iPhone XS review: Astonishment at a price
Latest News Articles
- Alcatel renew Rabbitohs partnership and talk up 2018 growth
- Vivo Nex Dual Display Release Date, Price, Specs and More
- Samsung Galaxy A8s Release Date, Price, Specs and More
- Wizards of the Coast invest $10 million into MTG: Arena esports
- PC World 2018 Editor's Choice Awards Nominees Announced
PCW Evaluation Team
Microsoft Office continues to make a student’s life that little bit easier by offering reliable, easy to use, time-saving functionality, while continuing to develop new features that further enhance what is already a formidable collection of applications
I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)
It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!
The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
- PC World 2018 Editor's Choice Awards
- Huawei Mate 20 Pro review: Full, in-depth, Australian review
- Razer Phone 2 review: One for the fans
- Everything you need to know about Smart TVs
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?